this post was submitted on 25 Nov 2023
257 points (87.7% liked)

World News

38978 readers
3827 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 71 points 11 months ago (32 children)

That's dumb. I understand restrictions on uncooked meats, but what harm could a cooked chicken breast do? This is what happens when officials blindly enforce rules without understanding the purpose of the rule in the first place.

load more comments (32 replies)
[–] [email protected] 59 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (11 children)

“Chicken meat poses a significant biosecurity risk to Australia, particularly the risk of highly pathogenic notifiable avian influenza (HPNAI) virus which can cause severe disease and mortality across Australia’s poultry industry, and may also affect wild bird populations.”

We do have a reputation for taking these things very seriously, as we should. We were even going to kill Johnny Depp's dogs at one point but settled for the "hostage video". Despite that, it does seem excessive in this case and should have been overturned on appeal at the very least.

Thankfully someone stepped up and ended up paying the fine on their behalf.

[–] interceder270 10 points 11 months ago (2 children)

We were even going to kill Johnny Depp’s dogs at one point but settled for the “hostage video”.

Let me guess, it's because he was rich and famous.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 11 months ago (5 children)

I think it was more about sending a message. In a way yes because he is famous, but in the way that they wanted to leverage that as a deterrence. It wasn't about "letting him off the hook". It was about using him as a platform to say to the world "we do not fuck around when it comes to this". If you've seen the hostage video you know what I mean 🤣

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Alexstarfire 45 points 11 months ago (1 children)

What shitty article. No explanation of anything. Get this shit out of here.

[–] Yoz 9 points 11 months ago

ChatGPT at your service kind Sir.

[–] robocall 41 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Granny shoulda watched that show, "border security: Australia"

[–] [email protected] 24 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

To make it worse, we have our own in New Zealand, which is the (worldwide) original of that format. The Aussie series is a spin-off.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Border_Patrol_(New_Zealand_TV_series)

[–] cyd 10 points 11 months ago

Funny thing is, NZ is actually stricter on this issue than Australia.

[–] Nihilore 36 points 11 months ago (18 children)

That’s a chicken burger in the picture, love when there’s an article about aus/nz but using American nomenclature

load more comments (18 replies)
[–] FlyingSquid 19 points 11 months ago (21 children)

The link didn't load for me, but this link has an interesting bit at the end-

"Meat has strict import conditions which can change quickly based on disease outbreaks," the spokesperson said, adding that passengers can be fined up to 6,260 Australian dollars, or around $4,100, for bringing unauthorized food items into the country.

It's not the first time a passenger has been fined for bringing an undeclared item through an Australian airport. In August, a passenger was fined $1,200 for walking with a rose at an airport in Australia. And in August last year, a passenger was fined $1,870 for packing McMuffin sandwiches on a flight from Bali to Australia.

https://www.businessinsider.com/australia-airport-food-fine-passenger-sandwich-passenger-pension-2023-11

load more comments (21 replies)
[–] No_Ones_Slick_Like_Gaston 8 points 11 months ago (2 children)

"Don't risk it for a Bisquit"

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›