this post was submitted on 16 Nov 2023
119 points (97.6% liked)

Technology

34436 readers
117 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AFKBRBChocolate 26 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Isn't that partly because Apple is one big company, but "Android" isn't? The number of Android phones rivals Apple, but they're made be a bunch of different companies, with Samsung selling the most.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 10 months ago (1 children)

12% is the max for Android OEMs, and they have to give a lot of concessions to Google to qualify.

As revealed in documents from Epic v. Google, Android's “Premier Device Program” offers 12 percent search revenue to devices with “Google exclusivity and defaults for all key functions” and no rival app stores.

In raw numbers in might make sense for Google, but I can assure you, no Android OEM will see it like that in the next negotiations.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

It's because Apple users are high-grade consoomers who click and engage with a lot more ads on average than Android users.

Of course it's worth it to get hands on the most succulent customer segment out there.

[–] Bye 3 points 10 months ago

It’s because apple users are generally wealthier. Not surprising since their phones are more expensive.

[–] cheese_greater 12 points 10 months ago

This is gonna be amazing, i get the popcorn, they get the chum

[–] reddig33 7 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

And?

  1. Apple’s market share may be larger than some of these other device manufacturers.
  2. Clickthrough on Apple devices might be higher.
  3. Apple is obviously better at negotiating.
  4. There is nothing stopping OEMs from switching default search providers.
[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


The big participants in this program are/were Motorola, LG, and HMD, which had at least 98 percent of their devices qualify.

Other brands like Xiaomi, Sony, Sharp, and BBK (that's OnePlus, Oppo, and Vivo) were at 70 percent.

Android partners don't just get search revenue; they also get a cut of Google Play app sales and ads run on their devices.

Notably absent from that list is Samsung, which, as the biggest Android OEM, has its own deal with Google.

We're unsure how that was calculated, but Apple gets an $18 billion-a-year lump sum payment plus the 36 percent revenue share.

Pichai recently justified the huge payment gap by saying that Google has to share Android revenue with carriers, too, but that's not true in Apple's case.


The original article contains 626 words, the summary contains 127 words. Saved 80%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I haven’t read this article, but I’ve been following Epic V. Google a good bit, and don’t they also give carriers a share for Android? Either way it’s still crazy.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

They get a few % from app sales and ads if they quality for the highest tier, but most OEMs don't.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

Ahh, I see, thank you!