this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2023
156 points (97.0% liked)

politics

19244 readers
2457 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
156
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by MicroWave to c/politics
 

The Arizona senator believes she single-handedly saved the U.S. Senate.

What does the future hold for Kyrsten Sinema? The Arizona senator, who’s best described as a dull person’s idea of an interesting person, famously flounced from the Democratic Party last December. While she’s remained a part of the Democratic caucus since then, she’s now seeking reelection outside of its auspices and against a more institution-minded member of her former party, in the form of Representative Ruben Gallego—who’s not been subtle about his antipathy for the incumbent. So for the first time in a long while, Sinema’s been forced to consider the possibility that her time in Washington may be coming to an end.

But if remarks attributed to her in a new book by McKay Coppins are any guide, she seems sanguine about her future and determined to go out with her trademark delusions of grandeur. As Insider reported this week, Sinema makes a cameo in Coppins’s Romney: A Reckoning, in which she’s totally not mad about her dim reelection prospects. “I don’t care. I can go on any board I want to. I can be a college president. I can do anything,” she apparently told Mitt Romney. “I saved the Senate filibuster by myself. I saved the Senate by myself. That’s good enough for me.” She is, sadly, correct about her chances of cashing out. But the idea that she “saved the Senate” raises a rather obvious question: “From what, though—and for who?”

all 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] moneyinphx 56 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I’m ready for Ruben to replace her and actually have 2 good senators representing Arizona.

Reminder for everyone to register to vote and double check your voter registration. The GOP loves to purge voter records.

[–] SinningStromgald 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Getting rid of her and Manchin in the Democrat party would be oh so very lovely.

[–] caffinatedone 8 points 1 year ago

The difference is that Manchin, for all of his many flaws, is probably the only Democratic senator that we're likely to see from WV in the foreseeable future. So, the option isn't "Manchin or a better Democrat", it "Manchin or a hard right-wing republican". WV is one of the reddest of states and it's almost shocking that a Democrat won there at all and it's easy to understand why he bucks the party.

Sinema has no excuse aside from her seeming delusions of importance and dreams of cushy corporate cash once she's out.

[–] Fredselfish 26 points 1 year ago (5 children)

This bitch fucking cunt help the GOP and killed democracy and fucked up part is she 100% correct she will land a a great gig with lots of money and book deals.

When I think about it and how she just straight out says quite part out loud makes my blood boil.

Makes me wonder why do we gets nuts shooting up schools and bowling alley when people like her roam the streets.

She lied to get elected she was an enemy to people of Arizona who elected her and she gets walk away rich.

I hope we all take better care of who we cast our votes too not just anyone with a D by their name.

Voting third party for state and congress is doable and we should start pushing for more of them.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Voting third party for state and congress is doable and we should start pushing for more of them.

Tell me you don't understand Game Theory & math without telling me you don't understand Game Theory & math.

[–] Fredselfish -3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Bernie Sanders is an independent and is in the Senate no reason others can't as well. And Vermont is a red state.

[–] halferect 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Vermont is not a red state, and hasn't been since the early 90s

[–] Fredselfish -5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There governor I heard was Republican.

[–] halferect 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That is true but there state government,senators, congressman, and every presidential election since 92 has gone blue. They are considered a stronghold for the democratic party

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

By all means, prove Duverger's Law wrong.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I honestly don't think she's smart enough to be that devious. Every article I've read about her suggests she thinks she's the smartest person in the room. At best she's average enough to not have been problematic when she first ran for election.

And this whole "cashing in" she expects, she'll get something. But having her choice of boards to sit on? Please.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA 4 points 1 year ago

I've met some senators. They don't get elected for their intelligence.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Makes me wonder why do we gets nuts shooting up schools and bowling alley when people like her roam the streets.

I have wondered for ages when the people who chose violence, why didn't they pick appropriate victims? If you're going to be a murderer, why not murder horrible people?

[–] Odelay42 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Dude chill with the misogynist language. She's a villain and a coward, but damn there are words of condemnation that don't center her gender.

[–] Cruxifux 3 points 1 year ago

You can take cunt from me when you pry it from my cold dead hands.

[–] EmpathicVagrant 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Save the senate filibuster by myself

This says more than she was likely meant to

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Everyone knows that voters never shut up about the filibuster. Healthcare? A basic standard of living? Reproductive freedom? No thank you. Just useless procedural bullshit in the Senate please.

She's such a cosplay Senator. Five minutes in the office and she's already high on her own farts.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

She doesn't believe she saved democracy.

She believes it's time to cash out for services rendered, and she knows the system is on her side.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

"I got mine", from the Republican unsure about her stay in Congress. Damn wolf in sheep's clothing.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

cunts have warmth, depth and utility.

this hag? not so much.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago