this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2023
428 points (97.8% liked)

politics

19245 readers
2750 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] kescusay 152 points 1 year ago (18 children)

If anyone was wondering about this politician's party, he's a Republican.

(No one was actually wondering. We all knew immediately.)

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, I saw Washington and was like, it’s definitely a Republican.

[–] jaybone 11 points 1 year ago (11 children)

I’m a bit surprised Washington has a Republican senator. But I guess there’s plenty of rural areas.

[–] BURN 13 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Almost the entire eastern part of the state (minus Whitman county and a few others) is Red. It’s only west of the mountains that it’s primarily blue. The population ratio is massively in favor of west of the mountains though

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)
[–] specfreq 89 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

"he did not realize he had packed his pistol in his briefcase while he and his wife were traveling..."It was an honest mistake.""

He thought he could get away with it or he did make an honest mistake with a deadly weapon in an international incident. Either way, he should be held accountable for his actions in both situations.

[–] grabyourmotherskeys 47 points 1 year ago

I am cognizant enough that I search my pockets and any bags taken on the plane for fluids over 100ml so, yes, a gun seems like something you'd want to be conscious of.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Either way, he should be held accountable for his actions in both situations.

He might, since he was caught outside America, where claiming "I lost track of where my gun was" is an insane defense that would get your gun license revoked forever.

Once back in the US though, we worst he'll face is some disappointed tutting in his direction. The pro-gun crowd works very hard to ensure the "responsible" part of "responsible gun owner" stays entirely optional.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TheCoralReefsAreDying69 15 points 1 year ago

Wilson said in the statement that when the plane landed in Hong Kong, he “immediately went to customs officials and called their attention to the issue.”

If his statement is to be trusted, he did not try to get away with it

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Apart from that, the TSA did obviously not notice that he was carrying. Which means they either don't do their job, or they are worthless as such.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 82 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Putting aside for a second how the US should be dealing with the very real threat of gun violence in this country, I'm always surprised by the misunderstanding of the gravity that carrying a pistol in public has.

Its not just about keeping the safety on and making sure it doesn't go off in your pants. When you bring a gun with you, you're introducing a firearm to a situation where in many case there isnt one. That puts you and everyone else around you at significant risk of being shot now, where again, those odds used to be zero. Not only that, you're basically steering the bus now on who gets shot if violence should break out, and not everyone is trained to handle an actual confrontation with the appropriate skills.

That's what's so mind boggling. At the end of the day, carrying a weapon just makes you and everyone around you more likely to be shot, and people feel the need to do that as a state senator in Washington? It sounds pointless. I'll also add that the process of getting a concealed permit is mostly saying you won't commit a crime, and getting fingerprinted, that's generally it.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago (4 children)

People who carry weapons around are generally afraid of something, expand that out to an entire nation and you have the USA.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Anyone who needs weapons in order to feel safe in their own country/own home live in a shithole.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nucleative 66 points 1 year ago (6 children)

“It was an honest mistake. And I expect the situation to be resolved shortly,” Wilson said in the statement.

Wilson said in the statement that when the plane landed in Hong Kong, he “immediately went to customs officials and called their attention to the issue.”

I hope he doesn't assume his status as an American politician will solve the matter. According to the article he volunteered the information. But according to the linked article at RTHK the weapon was found by a customs agent.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 year ago (3 children)

TSA is a complete waste of tax dollars

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 year ago

Yeah, China, famous for their understanding of high-profile American “mistakes.”

🙄

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 54 points 1 year ago (11 children)

Who travels to a foreign country without knowing what is in their possession? Answer: Stupid people who should not own a gun.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] [email protected] 51 points 1 year ago

"Responsible gun owner"

[–] nucleative 32 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Wilson said he “discovered the weapon mid-flight between San Francisco and Hong Kong.”

The Portland TSA crew is about to get a serious reprimand.

[–] dual_sport_dork 53 points 1 year ago

I don't know if this is still the case, but I read a few years back that the TSA had a zero or near zero success rate in catching items deliberately put through their screening by their own auditors. I'd doubt they're too worried about it. Their job is not to stop terrorists, it's to hassle and intimidate innocent travelers to appear as if they're actually doing something in as flagrant and visible a manner as possible. That's why it's called security theater; it's not real, it's just play acting.

[–] uservoid1 13 points 1 year ago (5 children)

All he had to do was to approach the crew and tell them he has a gun, asking them if they know what to do next... WCGW

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] xpinchx 32 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Coming from someone who carries daily, I get that sometimes you forget it's there and carry into a post office or doctors office. What I don't get is how you forget when going to the airport. Internationally.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (7 children)

If you forget about carrying your gun, than you are not handling it with the required responsibility.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] CharlesDarwin 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But mah Second Amendment rights!

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Americans who believe their laws are applicable to the rest of the world are the worst.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] thorbot 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Most responsible gun owner

Also part of the US state government.

fucking great

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Rather than just pile on with "idiot LOL" comments I will offer this:

Segregate your airline travel bag from your "other stuff" bag. You need a dedicated backpack or case that you only use for air travel and never anything else.

If you multipurpose your rangebag or whatever, of course you could have potential issues even if you remove the weapons before travel (dogs could alert on the powder residue, etc.)

Likewise if you are a druggie or something you don't want to accidentally end up in Singapore or Russia with your weedbag you forgot was in your backpack.

Even something as inoccuous as having a backpack you used for camping could backfire on you if you leave your folding knife or lighter in there.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

"Druggie" "Weedbag"

Harsh toke brother

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›