this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2023
54 points (60.9% liked)

Fediverse

17744 readers
3 users here now

A community dedicated to fediverse news and discussion.

Fediverse is a portmanteau of "federation" and "universe".

Getting started on Fediverse;

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 141 points 1 year ago (2 children)

5.0.1: Before using the website, remember you will be interacting with actual, real people and communities. Lemmy.World is not a place for you to attack other groups of people. Every one of our users has a right to browse and interact with the website and all of its contents free of treatment such as harassment, bullying, violation of privacy or threats of violence.

[–] MrMusAddict 61 points 1 year ago (7 children)

In my opinion this is actually better than the CoC. The only thing "missing" is the definition of which qualities you shouldn't discriminate against. But that's now generalized into "groups of people".

I still can't discriminate against people based on any qualification. Hell, I technically can't discriminate against "pineapple on pizza eaters".

[–] [email protected] 47 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Good. Because it's fucking delicious and I don't care what the internet says. We all loved it in the 90s, and nothing has changed. It's still delicious, we just do less coke now.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Obligatory pizza related chime in. You fuck with jalapenos on that sexy pineapple pizza?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Pineapple pairs the best with spicy pizzas, I always add it as an extra.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sometimes I fucks with jalapenos, yeah. Especially if I'm high. Lol.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (10 children)

Jalapenos with the pineapple is so stupidly good. You get bacon on there and then it's like the crossroads of heavenly flavors. It's not a pizza for the meek.

It's a five gallon hat wearing, tambourine hand flailin, tastebuds up the wall wailin, genuine taste sensation!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Hot take: ham doesn't go on pizza. The pineapple isn't the problem

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] billiam0202 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You heretic! I want you to know that if I could discriminate against you for putting pineapple on pizza, I absolutely would!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

What about people who don't eat pizza crust?

[–] Shazbot 8 points 1 year ago

They are wonderful people. Especially when they tear off the crust so I can eat it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

They're useful idiots if they give me their crusts.

[–] Xylinna 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I love some pineapple pizza!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Some day we will eradicate your kind

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

By my reading of it, you can still discriminate against pineapple pizza eaters, or any other group whatsoever, you just can't harass, bully, violate their privacy or threaten them with violence. Which is fine by me, if someone wants to make a community only for ginger haired people and ban anyone they think isn't naturally ginger, that's their perogative.

[–] AFKBRBChocolate 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That was my takeaway, too, and I think it's positive. The nice thing is, if it turns out that the policy fosters behavior that's bad for the broader community, they can change it.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)

As it is worded you can't discriminate against nazis and racists either.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You can discriminate all you want, you just can't harass, bully, violate privacy or threaten violence.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think you can't read it too literally. Otherwise you also can't discriminate against "people who wrote their comment later" and so you can never stop reading the comments for fear of discriminating between "early comment writers" and "late comment writers".

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Literal is the only way these things are supposed to be read.

They could easily fix it by saying "groups (except for those that promote discrimination and/or hate such as nazis and racists)"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I like my pineapple pizzas with a bbq base 🤪 don't come after me 😂

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I'll split that pizza with you.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Nazis are a group of people. Republicans are a group of people. Pedophiles are a group of people.

[–] MrMusAddict 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

That's a bad faith argument. The ToS also says to not engage in illegal activity. The admonishment of Nazi's and Pedophiles is an admonishment of illegal evil.

Your inclusion of Republicans is a bit of an extreme juxtaposition. Feel free to admonish the individual evil views of Republicans, but to discriminate against Republicans purely for their association is rightly against ToS.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Need some context here: is this what we removed, something that's already somewhere else, a proposed replacement, or something else?

[–] stankmut 10 points 1 year ago

That paragraph is part of the new terms and conditions document they released.

[–] Geert 52 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

OP completely ignoring 5.0.1

[–] qaz 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Have you asked the admins/mods of lemmy.world about this before posting this?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

What were the old rules?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Redditors gonna Reddit

load more comments
view more: next ›