this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2023
105 points (94.9% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

6669 readers
1300 users here now

A community for your defence shitposting needs

Rules

1. Be niceDo not make personal attacks against each other, call for violence against anyone, or intentionally antagonize people in the comment sections.

2. Explain incorrect defense articles and takes

If you want to post a non-credible take, it must be from a "credible" source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it's non-credible. Low-hanging fruit such as random Twitter and YouTube comments belong in the Matrix chat.

3. Content must be relevant

Posts must be about military hardware or international security/defense. This is not the page to fawn over Youtube personalities, simp over political leaders, or discuss other areas of international policy.

4. No racism / hatespeech

No slurs. No advocating for the killing of people or insulting them based on physical, religious, or ideological traits.

5. No politics

We don't care if you're Republican, Democrat, Socialist, Stalinist, Baathist, or some other hot mess. Leave it at the door. This applies to comments as well.

6. No seriousposting

We don't want your uncut war footage, fundraisers, credible news articles, or other such things. The world is already serious enough as it is.

7. No classified material

Classified ‘western’ information is off limits regardless of how "open source" and "easy to find" it is.

8. Source artwork

If you use somebody's art in your post or as your post, the OP must provide a direct link to the art's source in the comment section, or a good reason why this was not possible (such as the artist deleting their account). The source should be a place that the artist themselves uploaded the art. A booru is not a source. A watermark is not a source.

9. No low-effort posts

No egregiously low effort posts. E.g. screenshots, recent reposts, simple reaction & template memes, and images with the punchline in the title. Put these in weekly Matrix chat instead.

10. Don't get us banned

No brigading or harassing other communities. Do not post memes with a "haha people that I hate died… haha" punchline or violating the sh.itjust.works rules (below). This includes content illegal in Canada.

11. No misinformation

NCD exists to make fun of misinformation, not to spread it. Make outlandish claims, but if your take doesn’t show signs of satire or exaggeration it will be removed. Misleading content may result in a ban. Regardless of source, don’t post obvious propaganda or fake news. Double-check facts and don't be an idiot.


Join our Matrix chatroom


Other communities you may be interested in


Banner made by u/Fertility18

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 year ago

it's not in space, it's on the ground

It occupies space dunnit?? Checkmate.

[–] Xanthrax 25 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

If anyone is wondering, it's the iron beam.

Edit: here's extra evidence : (45 seconds, in) https://youtu.be/RF6eHC4JBXA?si=n03ib5E1ONgexQns

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Hell March intensifies...

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Most likely yes since there's no interceptor missiles visible, but the streaks of light are still just glare from a dirty lens. The first two projectiles were killed by two separate lasers because it takes a bit for a laser to heat its target up.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

This is just somebody's grimy phone camera seeing streaks of light around the bright flashes. You get these when you wipe your lens carelessly with linear movements. It's a funny coincidence that the two flashes happen to allign in the direction of these streaks.

You can see the same effect in the bottom left corner of the screen when the view briefly pans left, around what might be an off screen streetlight.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No, that's a 100kw laser superheating the air. You are looking at a vapor trail like the railgun from Quake.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Could well be Iron beam (especially since we see no interceptor missiles around), but there's two of them here because one laser can't take out two targets at the same time, and the streaks of light are not from the lasers.

[–] wwaxen 12 points 1 year ago

The (surface-to-)space laser. That's what they meant all along.

[–] shalafi 8 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

An astronaut in the ISS be like (⁀ᗢ⁀)

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

but contrary to magic the gathering, they fire up not down

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago