this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2023
107 points (95.7% liked)

politics

19144 readers
3167 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The strategy could help secure additional Ukraine funding despite some Republican opposition, said a White House official and two lawmakers.

The Biden administration and key lawmakers in Congress are actively discussing whether aid to Israel could be linked to more funding for Ukraine as a strategy to pass both spending priorities, according to an administration official and two pro-Ukraine Republican lawmakers.

Lawmakers in both parties who support additional aid for Ukraine have suggested the approach as a potential way to secure funding for Kyiv despite opposition from some Republican members in the House and the Senate.

A group of House conservatives has steadfastly opposed new funding for Ukraine, which the White House has requested, and the issue is sure to be a factor in the GOP conference’s high-stakes leadership elections this week. Additional aid for Israel in the wake of Hamas’ brutal attack on Israelis is seen as less likely to face such a struggle in Congress.

The White House is quietly evaluating the political viability of linking aid for Ukraine and Israel, the administration official said, while acknowledging that ultimately the decision will be up to Congress.

top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago (2 children)

What do the MAGA people rightfully condemning Hamas for their actions think the Russians did when they invaded Ukraine?

[–] sirboozebum 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The Palestinians now have a response to anybody who says they should just compromise with Israel.

"Should Ukraine just compromise with Russia and give up their land?"

[–] Everythingispenguins 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Now now that is an uncomfortable truth and as a white person I don't like those. Please don't bring that up again.

[–] sirboozebum 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

No Western government really cares about the dispossession and oppression of Palestinians for the last ~70 years because none of them care about Arabs dying.

It's why the third world collectively responded with a shrug when Western governments demanded action against Russia (and just if anyone is wondering, I'm greatly opposed to the Russian invasion).

It's hard for them to reconcile the double standard.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

They think that the Ukrainians were being mean to their good friend Vladimir Putin who only has the best interests of America in his heart and is a very good friend to Trump, who has never done anything wrong.

Also, being a hypocrite is part of being a MAGAt.

[–] jordanlund 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Why not link it to aid for the Pennsylvania train derailments? Or the Hawaii fires?

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago

I'm not sure why you would expect Republicans to care about either of those.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

There has been quite a bit of aid for both of those disasters

[–] salvador 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

because for US killing people and managable chaos are more important endeavours.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

PUTIN: "No, not like that!"

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Lawmakers in both parties who support additional aid for Ukraine have suggested the approach as a potential way to secure funding for Kyiv despite opposition from some Republican members in the House and the Senate.

The White House is quietly evaluating the political viability of linking aid for Ukraine and Israel, the administration official said, while acknowledging that ultimately the decision will be up to Congress.

The National Security Council’s coordinator for strategic communications, Adm. John Kirby, said Monday, “Both are important, and we are a large enough, big enough, economically viable and vibrant enough country to be able to support both.”

In his call with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Biden vowed to support Israel’s requests in the coming days and weeks, the administration official said.

The short-term spending bill that Biden signed into law last month to avoid a government shutdown didn’t include any new funding for Ukraine, kicking off a debate about how to handle the matter.

McCarthy, who isn’t running again for speaker, declined to say at a news conference Monday whether aid to Israel should be part of a package with funding for Ukraine and border security.


The original article contains 745 words, the summary contains 191 words. Saved 74%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Or we could stop wasting money propping up other countries and having a needlessly bloated military, and we could like house the homeless and make college free and have free Healthcare and better wages and take care of our environmental issues better....

oh who am I kidding

[–] Everythingispenguins 3 points 1 year ago

Draft the homeless two birds one stone.

/s

[–] nothingness 1 points 1 year ago

US would stop sending weapons to the wars? Stop trying to make peice by weapons? No.....