this post was submitted on 08 Oct 2023
559 points (97.5% liked)

Google

1740 readers
44 users here now

A Lemmy community dedicated to Google products and everything Google.

Rules

  1. Keep it Google.
  2. Keep it SFW.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Stovetop 92 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I had to use the mobile version of Chrome recently on a locked down work device with an MDM policy that prevented installation of other browsers. It made me realize I had no idea just how far gone the mobile web has become with ads.

As an experiment I grabbed a random article on my Google News feed for today and opened it in Chrome with no ad blocking allowed and Samsung Internet with ad blocking enabled to compare.

Chrome produces a nightmarish hell scape of ads that just gets worse the further down you scroll.

Samsung Internet isn't perfect because there is still a large banner taking up space at the top of the screen, but it blocks all of the ads in the article along with the website's own ads for other articles.

The cynic in me, however, acknowledges that the truth of the situation looks more like this, even with ad blocking enabled.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Thanks for the this, I got a chuckle. Especially gizmodo...

[–] Hotdogman 90 points 1 year ago (1 children)

aD BloCkeRs aRe RuINinG oUR wEbSitE!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 74 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Weird, I don't see anything like this on firefox.

[–] [email protected] 44 points 1 year ago (2 children)

What godawful browser is injecting that ai nonsense? The ads are bad enough but the browser itself seems to be using 1/3rd of the screen

[–] icedterminal 25 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

This is on an iPhone. They're using Microsoft's Edge "browser" which is just a reskinned Safari.

For those who don't know, Apple's developer terms explicitly state:

2.5.6 Apps that browse the web must use the appropriate WebKit framework and WebKit JavaScript.

https://developer.apple.com/app-store/review/guidelines/

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Until Apple changes the rule to comply with new EU laws. Hope those laws will affect users globally, not just in the EU.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Idk why the other guys saying it’s some edge browser. This is the google app on iPhone. The bottom part pops up when you click on articles because they’re pushing their AI summaries. It’s actually a great feature but it’s annoying how much space it takes up

[–] Illuminati 43 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Honestly web browsing on mobile has been a piece of sh1t for a long time, without adblockers it's a total cancer.

And even with an adblocker it's always the god damn cookie popups...

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

Firefox has a plugin called I Don't Care About Cookies, Which basically just ignores the pop-ups and auto except / rejects them, but for some strange reason that plugins you can add to the mobile version of Firefox are extremely limited.

Essentially the plugin implements the functionality that should have been mandated under the cookie law to begin with which makes the choice browser side rather than web side

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (6 children)

I think ublock has a block list for cookie notices as well

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

OMG why aren't these checked by default

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] AProfessional 3 points 1 year ago

You can install any extension in the beta version. Some won’t work though.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Firefox and uBlock Origin…. Now sadly I wish I could find something like that on iPhone.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Change the phone dns to nextdns.io or adguards dns. Use dns over https if possible.

[–] Alivrah 9 points 1 year ago

I use 1blocker on the iPhone. Unfortunately (iirc) they stopped doing lifetime purchase and went the subscription route. Luckily I purchased it before they did that.

It works great.

[–] Crow 8 points 1 year ago

iPhone has AdGuard pro.

[–] AtariDump 4 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Setup a PiHole. Not 100% guaranteed but it stops a lot.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not sure atm what the extension I use for safari on iPhone is called, but it works great for me. I‘ll look it up when I get to it

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Firefox and reader mode is your best option for mobile.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Just use adguard on an iPhone. I see 0 ads across all apps I use.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago

I love how it just keep getting worst as I scroll.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Why do you choose to view ads? Inaction is a choice.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Yup. I work from home and have a pihole on my network at home so I've gotten used to not seeing the ads.

Was browsing on mobile data while on the road and was reminded why its necessary. It was unbearable.

[–] ObsidianZed 3 points 1 year ago

I do the same with an (almost) always-on vpn to the same pi with wireguard set up. I use Tasker on Android to auto start the wireguard tunnel if I disconnect from my home Wi-Fi. I typically only disable it if I'm running into issues with an app etc, and I'm too lazy to dig into and whitelist any relevant domain.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] TeamDman 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Would be nice if such behaviour tanked SEO

[–] rip_art_bell 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

From what I understand, web crawlers see a totally different version of the site than users do

[–] TeamDman 12 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Only due to using a different user agent, it's totally possible to build a for-the-people pagerank that would see what we see and deprioritize stuff like ads and fluff on recipe pages

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What, you don't enjoy ads on your articles that are also ads?

[–] jcit878 3 points 1 year ago

don't you enjoy discussing with your friends and family what interesting ads you've seen lately? - what marketers think people actually do

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

And yet they're baffled as to why so many people use adblockers

[–] LemmyNameMyself 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Just to clarify what's happening here - The top 15% of the screenshot? That's the website itself. The rest is an ad. That's actually insane.

I've been wishing for an ability to blacklist search results somehow, because of websites like this. For tech, stuff like CNET or Zdnet. For gaming, it's gamesradar, or CBR, or especially gameranx. All just garbage information with 300 cookies to feed the ad networks

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Have you considered Kagi? I've not used it but it looks like it has the exact features you want.

[–] fiddlestix 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Kagi is fabulous. You can also use nextdns to block ads from getting in. They have a generous free tier and the unlimited is cheap. I have it on my router = ad free house.

[–] Anonymousllama 5 points 1 year ago

Spot on for what browsing without adblockers looks like. What a hellscape

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Calyxos+firefox+ublock for phone

Gentoo+librewolf+ublock for the home

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›