this post was submitted on 08 Oct 2023
151 points (96.9% liked)

Technology

59665 readers
3278 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s
[email protected]
[email protected]
L4s
enu
151
China shares ambitious plans to double its space station as the ISS approaches the end of its life cycle (interestingengineering.com)
submitted 1 year ago by L4s to c/technology
20 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

China shares ambitious plans to double its space station as the ISS approaches the end of its life cycle::undefined

top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] raspberriesareyummy 42 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sadly enough, the international community is really good at infighting and wasting money, and really bad at coming up with a followup for the ISS :( So China, for all its flaws, will have the biggest functioning space station in LEO at some point. ISS operations have just been extended to 2034, but if we get a single micrometeorite hit in the wrong spot (e.g. Node 2), that'll put an end to it.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I wish the world was better at just giving a ton of money to science and space. It's such an obvious use of money, if you ask me.

Especially since the future of humanity, given that we survive, is in space. There is a lot of potential for space-based infrastructure.

[–] SpacetimeMachine 9 points 1 year ago

Too many people think that when we spend money on space, that we are literally sending the money into orbit. Almost all of it is going back into the economy and keeping tons of businesses alive.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I don't really understand how the entire ISS could be "end of life cycle." Aren't there a bunch of different modules of different ages? And anyway, the oldest modules are 24 years old that is nothing with proper maintenance, there are 50 year old trains still in operation daily.

[–] Beardsley 21 points 1 year ago

Space trains fall under a different regulating authority than space stations, unfortunately.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

If a train fails, at worst that will happen is it will stop. When a space station fails, the worst that will happen is everyone inside dies.

In addition, a space station is far more expensive, and it may be simply too expensive to still maintain old technology. Ideally, at some point, one will replace it with a newer, more modern, space station. Which will both be cheaper, and allow more, novel, science to be done. Although I don't know if there is any plan for that.

I'd like to see a space station with a rotating ring, that generates artificial gravity through centrifugal acceleration.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

Lol that's nowhere near the worst scenario for a train failure.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I don't know why can't they just send it to a Lagrange point and leave it there. Burning it seems like literally burning money.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

Space races are good for science. As long as spacex engineers keep Elon at bay, Starship should be able to launch stage biggest station modules in history.