this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2023
179 points (97.4% liked)

Data is Beautiful

5072 readers
62 users here now

A place to share and discuss visual representations of data: Graphs, charts, maps, etc.

DataIsBeautiful is for visualizations that effectively convey information. Aesthetics are an important part of information visualization, but pretty pictures are not the sole aim of this subreddit.

A place to share and discuss visual representations of data: Graphs, charts, maps, etc.

  A post must be (or contain) a qualifying data visualization.

  Directly link to the original source article of the visualization
    Original source article doesn't mean the original source image. Link to the full page of the source article as a link-type submission.
    If you made the visualization yourself, tag it as [OC]

  [OC] posts must state the data source(s) and tool(s) used in the first top-level comment on their submission.

  DO NOT claim "[OC]" for diagrams that are not yours.

  All diagrams must have at least one computer generated element.

  No reposts of popular posts within 1 month.

  Post titles must describe the data plainly without using sensationalized headlines. Clickbait posts will be removed.

  Posts involving American Politics, or contentious topics in American media, are permissible only on Thursdays (ET).

  Posts involving Personal Data are permissible only on Mondays (ET).

Please read through our FAQ if you are new to posting on DataIsBeautiful. Commenting Rules

Don't be intentionally rude, ever.

Comments should be constructive and related to the visual presented. Special attention is given to root-level comments.

Short comments and low effort replies are automatically removed.

Hate Speech and dogwhistling are not tolerated and will result in an immediate ban.

Personal attacks and rabble-rousing will be removed.

Moderators reserve discretion when issuing bans for inappropriate comments. Bans are also subject to you forfeiting all of your comments in this community.

Originally r/DataisBeautiful

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] hark 53 points 1 year ago (3 children)

They shouldn't be allowed to vote salary increases for themselves unless they get at least a 70% favorable rating.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I always thought that their salaries should be determined by something like a multiple of the median salary. Country/State/District, whatever.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago

Now that's a fucking great idea. Let's ban legal bribery while we're at it

[–] cryptiod137 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

As long as that multiple is zero

Only slightly kidding

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In my mind the multiple would go anywhere from 2.0 - 0.8. Of course in my world voters would hold their reps responsible for their votes and corruption, so I'm just whistling in the wind here.

[–] cryptiod137 2 points 1 year ago

I could see 2x of the lower of mean or median.

Yeah...

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Eh, less salary means only wealthy ppl can be in congress. What we need is for a lifetime forfeiture of all assets other than those provided by the state. You join congress, you get room and board for life, but nothing else.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

OR, now hear me out, term limits. No more career politicians.

[–] FireTower 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Political office was intended to be a public service not a profession.

[–] cryptiod137 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's basically like putting them all in jail, which is not a bad idea, but for totally different reasons

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

What more American than putting ppl into jail?

[–] slazer2au 11 points 1 year ago

I say they should be able to, if minimum wage is increased by the same percentage.

Or cap their wages to inflation.

[–] Potatos_are_not_friends 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

There's absolutely no reason to have a mirror of the data but faded.

The average person can extrapolate that if 25% of people like something, then roughly 75% of people hate it.

[–] ALavaPulsar 10 points 1 year ago

You can also have an indifferent or neutral opinion.

[–] SmoothIsFast 4 points 1 year ago

I think you overestimate the intelligence of the average person