this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2023
266 points (94.3% liked)

politics

19146 readers
3271 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

We were at the sinks in the ladies room, the stranger and I, washing our hands, when a trans woman came out of a stall, looked in the mirror and sighed. After she left, the stranger turned to me and said: “Can you believe that? A man, in here!” She shook her head disapprovingly.

This was 20 years ago, but I’ve never forgotten that stranger’s disdain. It has stayed with me, because the moment called for me to respond to her with courage. What I delivered instead was cowardice.

“I don’t think she’s doing anybody any harm,” I said, quietly, and then rushed out.

What I didn’t say was, “I’m trans, too.” I didn’t tell her that I knew firsthand what it was like, in the early stages of transition, to face the constant threat of judgment, and cruelty, even violence. Or, that I knew all too well how much difference a touch of kindness could make during that very hard time.

I’ve thought back to that exchange as the issue of trans rights, and trans identity, has joined — if not displaced — abortion as one of the go-to issues riling up the conservative base. When I came out, in 2000, Republicans barely registered trans identity, let alone attacked it. Now, more than two decades later, we have become the right’s favorite boogeymen. And boogeywomen. So effective has the orchestrated blowback become that Florida — the state where I once joyfully vacationed with my family — has become a place I am afraid now even to visit. I would no sooner retire there than I would consider retiring to North Korea.

To some degree, we’ve arrived at this moment because abortion and trans rights are, in some ways, two sides of the same coin — issues that go to the core of what we mean by bodily autonomy, and what kinds of choices individuals get to make about our private, physical selves.

We’ve also arrived at this moment because the same tactics that succeeded in marginalizing, demonizing and even criminalizing abortion have been trained upon us. As Irin Carmon reported for New York magazine in April on the melding of these two movements, “we’ve reached the point of cross-pollination.” Now that anti-abortion efforts following the Dobbs decision aren’t proving to be the political win Republicans had hoped, many are doubling down on the belief that demonizing the 0.6 percent of Americans over the age of 12 who identify as trans, and the 1.2 million adults in America who identify as nonbinary, is a surefire ticket to electoral success.

What are those tactics? Well, for one, conservative political strategists and G.O.P. presidential hopefuls alike have taken to describing the more controversial aspects of trans experience as the defining issues, just as they have long exaggerated the frequency of exceedingly rare abortions performed later in pregnancy, pretending that they are routine. (For the back of the house: Abortions occurring at or after 21 weeks of pregnancy represented less than 1 percent of all legal abortions performed in the United States in 2020.)

This same group of conservatives has also exploited Americans’ impatience with nuance to define extremely complex issues in the most simplistic of terms. And finally, they have taken advantage of the fact that many Americans think they don’t know a transgender person, at least in part because, just like me in that bathroom, so many of us choose to be invisible, out of weariness, and out of fear — just as so many American women never share that the decision to terminate a pregnancy is one they’ve had to make themselves.

It’s not just dangerous rhetoric. In 2023 alone, some 20 states banned or limited gender-affirming care for minors; similar legislation is being debated in a number of others. Conservatives began by claiming they were protecting children — despite protests from the American Academy of Pediatrics that trans children should “have access to comprehensive, gender-affirming, and developmentally appropriate health care that is provided in a safe and inclusive clinical space.” But they’re now even attempting to restrict care for adults. In 2022, Gov. Ron DeSantis of Florida stripped trans people of their Medicaid access to gender-affirming health care. That action was struck down by a federal judge, but similar bans are in the works nationwide.

If you only listened to the Republican debate last month or to conservative news, you might be forgiven for thinking that the most important issue for transgender women in this country is the right to play on a female sports team. Or that we believe that every 6-year-old who expresses uncertainty about their gender ought to be immediately taken to a clinic and administered puberty blockers. Or that every predator serving time in prison deserves immediate and unfettered access to the showers in the women’s prison. (This — even though a 2015 survey found that trans people are 10 times as likely to be sexually assaulted by their fellow inmates, and five times as likely to be sexually assaulted by prison staff members.) You might even believe that de-transitioning, and transition regret, are commonplace, instead of rare (widely believed to be about 1 percent).

All these stories leave out the happy and successful trans folks I’ve met over the course of my life — doctors, airplane pilots, a small-town manager, a fire captain, even an astrophysicist — whose primary desire has always been to simply get on with their lives, and to spend their days in peace.

I have often said that the most important thing needed to understand trans people is what has been termed a “moral imagination,” the ability to understand what the experience of being human is like for people who are different from ourselves. But how can strangers learn about us if they don’t know us?

Conservatives have succeeded in demonizing trans people in part because so many Americans have said they’d never known anyone who is trans. In part this is because our numbers are small, but it’s also, in part, because many trans people, post-transition, are not immediately “readable” as trans. It’s important to note that lots of us don’t “pass,” and aren’t particularly interested in passing. But for many — especially the older members of the cohort — blending in with the rest of society has been at least an occasional goal. In part this is because we’ve found our peace; but it’s also because anonymity can protect us from violence.

Knowing a person who has had an abortion — just like knowing someone who is trans — can change Americans’ opinions about it. Only ​​50 percent of people who say they don’t know anyone who’s had an abortion think it should be legal in most, or all, cases, but 69 percent of people who say they have an “acquaintance” who’s had an abortion think it should be legal in most, or all cases — and that number increases to 78 percent among those with a “close friend” who’s had one.

These numbers echo attitudes toward trans people, too: Only about 33 percent of Americans who say they’ve never known anyone trans believe that gender can be different from the sex assigned at birth. But among people who do know a trans person, that number jumps to more than half — 54 percent.

So many brave trans people are living out and proud, and so many have faced dire societal consequences for doing so. It can be scary to be out in this political/social environment. But perhaps more of us need to find the courage to do the thing I failed to do in that bathroom long ago, and turn to a stranger and say something stronger than, “I don’t think she’s doing anybody any harm.”

What I should have said was: “That was a human being. That was a person deserving kindness, and protection, and love. That was a person like me.”

all 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] girltwink 37 points 1 year ago

The invisibility problem is real and frustrating. People have this image in their head of trans women being caricatures of women because their only exposure to trans women is sensationalized headlines showing unflattering pictures of trans women, or people who are very visible because they're early in transition, (or in the case of repressed conservative men, trans porn). The ones who just look like cis women are invisible, and so no one knows they exist.

[–] Sanctus 30 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Theres this reoccuring pattern every where. People are afraid and are hostile towards what they don't know. I know have met five different trans people and I know its crazy but they are just people. Thats it. Its the simplest thing ever. To quote the Vampire King, I do not fear the unknown!

[–] FlyingSquid 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I have two trans friends. One was out before I knew her, so I can't say much about her life before she transitioned, but the other was someone I knew in high school who transitioned between then and when we reconnected over social media. When she was still "he," I always thought of "him" as a quiet, sad person. Now she's positive and upbeat and constantly developing new skills to an amazing degree.

If that's what transitioning can do to help someone who feels the way she did in high school, we should be supporting the people who transition, not being hostile toward them.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This person at my work started recently. They were going by their birth name and "she", but mentioned during a smoke break that they were actually trans and had a different name. I immediately went into the managers office and printed a new nametag and texted the other managers that they needed to start calling them by their correct name and by "he". I was so proud that everyone on my team immediately switched to the right name. This person went from quiet, acting quite miserable and just sad to really happy and upbeat as soon as we changed to the right name. Then this fucking nasty bitch of a manager came in and pulled one of us aside and said "I'm not calling her correct name and I won't be calling her a he." I honestly could have just knocked her the fuck out. You're telling me whatever bullshit going on in your head is worth trying to take this young person's happiness and joy away? Fuck you right in the neck you fucking cunt.

[–] FlyingSquid 9 points 1 year ago

These are miserable people want to make everyone else just as miserable as them.

[–] electrogamerman 2 points 1 year ago

I dont think its necessarily wrong to fear the unknown. What I think is wrong is staying ignorant to the unknown and judge it based on nothing.

Im pretty sure if all these transphobes/queerphobes learn a little bit about lgbtq, most of them would realize how stupid their thoughts are.

But these ignorant dont even want people to get educated about these topics, they want to stay ignorants and keep others ignorants too.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago

The secret ingredient is ✨🌈 misogyny ✨🌈

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It's Christianity. They believe getting an abortion is murder and being gay or trans is a sin. Because conservatives want to live like it's 1950. It's bullshit.

[–] kromem 13 points 1 year ago

like it's ~~1950~~ 50 CE

Canonical Christianity simply froze the attitudes of religious conservatives in a very repressed society (relative to the time even) and set them in stone for future generations.

Gay Marriage? Gender identity?

In the 60s CE Nero, emperor of Rome, married two men. In the first Nero was the bride, and in the second the other person - castrated before puberty - was the bride.

Suddenly in Mark, the earliest of the canonical gospels (dated in extant form to after 70 CE), had Jesus making an explicit point about how marriage was only between a man and a woman in a passage that's been used to justify persecuting homosexual relationships for nearly two millennia since.

Meanwhile here's an excerpt from the Gospel of Thomas, a text with parts going back to the 1st century which was declared heretical and buried in a jar for 1600 years because possession meant death during that interim:

Jesus said to them, "When you make the two into one, [...] and when you make male and female into a single one, so that the male will not be male nor the female be female, [...] then you will enter [the kingdom]."

The young women in Corinth in the mid 1st century depose the bishop of Rome's appointees such that the bishop writes a letter shaming schisms and praising the silence of women, and then years later 1 Timothy is forged to have Paul declare that women shouldn't be allowed to teach (tangentially, the tradition which followed the Gospel of Thomas claimed itself to a female teacher).

How did that impact women's rights?

We are just barely out of the dark ages the version of Christianity which survived in the hands of the despots and tyrants of patriarchal monarchy forced the world under.

And the wild thing is that so many in the modern age are diligently trying to keep the beast that's reigned for a thousand years in its place. Their blind faith as their only guiding light.

Luckily I think that commitment is moronic and that the age on whose precipice we sit on is an age of intelligence that will suffer fools lightly.

[–] FlyingSquid 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They don't though. They think they do, but they don't. Because they'd be told to shave that beard, get a haircut, put on a suit, tie and hat and pay their fair share of taxes.

They like the part about black people and women being second class, but the rest isn't as appealing to them as they think.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

Yeah we all know it's just an excuse to trample over other people's rights while feeling holier than thou. More people have been killed in the name of God than for any other reason, after all.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Christianity actually historically tends to lean towards abortion being acceptable historically as long as the father grants permission or the act was done by skydaddy. Skydaddy aborted a LOT of unborn babies in the old testament and of a woman was harmed in such a way that the baby she was carrying was lost the person who harmed her had to pay the farther reparations as the baby was his property.. This is a key note about how the old testament treats babies in general, as property, and only skydaddy could take that away involuntarily without repayment.

The new testament barely mentions babies.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

So true. I have no idea where most modern Christian dogma even comes from.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The tactics they used to fight abortion, worked damn well, in their opinion, so on to the next group of people on the list.

After they're done oppressing trans people, they'll move to the next group on the list.

There will always be list. That is how they unite their base of backwards brainfarts.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

For those people all the problems come from beeing different and through that, having to discuss stuff wich should be allready clear. Weirdos make the world complicated and they want their life easy and what is an easy solution? Make the weirdows disappear. And you better stay in line or you are the next.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think it's largely about control, but on a couple of different levels.

The people who fund the party, use it as a funnel to regress protections and restrictions so they can concentrate wealth and power and force people into situations that ensure that.

The people who vote are left in constant fear that they don't have control over their lives, their futures, and everything is being taken away from them (it's not true, but it's easy to manufacture that perspective).

The politicians leverage this by targeting smaller groups of people, pushing them as a threat, and using it to mobilize votes for nonsensical policies that don't solve any issues the voters actually face. But it feels like progress. Since 2016, there's an additional side of this where it's given some people the audacity to think they can treat people like shit, again because it gives them a sense of being able to control something in their lives, and this is really powerful as a motivator. It doesn't matter that it works against their entire identity they've built up.

[–] grue 3 points 1 year ago

The people who vote are left in constant fear that they don’t have control over their lives, their futures, and everything is being taken away from them (it’s not true, but it’s easy to manufacture that perspective).

I mean, it is true, but the blame is being misdirected. (That's probably part of what makes the propaganda so effective.)

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

This is a fine window into the lived experience of being trans at this moment in the United States. Though the guidance to "shout your trans-ness" is going to be met with a bit skepticism. It's pretty tiring to hear that, once again, it's the job of the victimized individual to take actions and embrace risks of personal safety to be treated with basic human dignity.

I'm one of those who are out and unable to hide it. I can't help but take those risks merely by existing. I acknowledge the tremendous support I would receive if my gender-expansive siblings who are able to make their way in the world as their lived genders were to take this author's recommendation. But I wouldn't be so bold as to insist upon in.

We support each other in the ways we can, and whatever support is offered is enough.

[–] PostmodernPythia 10 points 1 year ago

If people can live free from the idea that biology is destiny, where will the right get its reproductive and domestic labor? That’s why abortion and transgender people get talked about the same way; both challenge the gendered distribution of money and power, both declare that common humanity matters more than differences in sexual/reproductive plumbing.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


To some degree, we’ve arrived at this moment because abortion and trans rights are, in some ways, two sides of the same coin — issues that go to the core of what we mean by bodily autonomy, and what kinds of choices individuals get to make about our private, physical selves.

As Irin Carmon reported for New York magazine in April on the melding of these two movements, “we’ve reached the point of cross-pollination.” Now that anti-abortion efforts following the Dobbs decision aren’t proving to be the political win Republicans had hoped, many are doubling down on the belief that demonizing the 0.6 percent of Americans over the age of 12 who identify as trans, and the 1.2 million adults in America who identify as nonbinary, is a surefire ticket to electoral success.

presidential hopefuls alike have taken to describing the more controversial aspects of trans experience as the defining issues, just as they have long exaggerated the frequency of exceedingly rare abortions performed later in pregnancy, pretending that they are routine.

If you only listened to the Republican debate last month or to conservative news, you might be forgiven for thinking that the most important issue for transgender women in this country is the right to play on a female sports team.

All these stories leave out the happy and successful trans folks I’ve met over the course of my life — doctors, airplane pilots, a small-town manager, a fire captain, even an astrophysicist — whose primary desire has always been to simply get on with their lives, and to spend their days in peace.

But perhaps more of us need to find the courage to do the thing I failed to do in that bathroom long ago, and turn to a stranger and say something stronger than, “I don’t think she’s doing anybody any harm.”


The original article contains 1,383 words, the summary contains 307 words. Saved 78%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!