this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2023
1082 points (91.1% liked)

Programmer Humor

19471 readers
1162 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
1082
They tried (programming.dev)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

EDIT: I didn't realize the anger this would bring out of people. It was supposed to be a funny meme based on recent real-life situations I've encountered, not an attack on the EU.

I appreciate the effort of the EU cookie laws. The practice of them just doesn't live up to the theory of the law. Shady companies are always going to find a way to be shady.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 189 points 1 year ago (17 children)

Any website that does that I just close the tab.

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] [email protected] 156 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I refuse to go to sites that do this, I also refuse to go to sites that block adblock...and specially the sites that detect and block private browsing, that one shouldn't even be a thing

[–] [email protected] 42 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Sites that block adblock - I have network based filtering I'm not going to take the time to specifically figure out what ad providers you're using (which is probably that same as everyone else) just to unblock your shitty site.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] ozymandias117 31 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The fun part is that websites that do this are illegal in the EU

They need to start flexing that 4% revenue / year fines

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ignotum 15 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I don't use adblock, and yet i keep getting "disable adblock to view this" messages, fuck this shit

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Why the fuck would they prevent private browsing? I use that a lot to be sure the session is closed correctly.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 143 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Cool. One less website to visit. Not like there is a shortage.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 85 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I'm pretty sure breaking your website with no cookies is against the rules, actually. It's either serve the EU with GDPR-compliance or GTFO entirely.

Yeah, you could still just break the law, but as usual there's a cost to that one way or the other.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago

this. and honestly I wish more websites followed the "serve under gdpr or don't have a European marker". A random blog once wasn't available in the EU because of GDPR. And you know what? It's better than them violating GDPR and the EU doing nothing.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Tons of companies break the cookie law already, but enforcement seems to be rare

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 70 points 1 year ago

Your meme is funny, but people genuinely use these arguments to be against sensible EU laws, hence the response I imagine.

[–] [email protected] 57 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Yeah being unable to open… checks notes local news websites from the US has been a real deal breaker

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago

Sometimes its relieving when you go to do something and you find out that you have already finished, lol.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 51 points 1 year ago (9 children)

That's gotta be quite some website you visited, if it didn't load at all without cookies. As someone from Germany, who mostly rejects every sites cookies, except for the essential ones most of the time, but sometimes outright rejects all cookies, I've never encountered a website that refused to load upon doing that.

Not defending any webpages that do do that, just contributing my personal experience.

Also: this for chrome or this for fiefrerfx

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago

Also from Germany. Some american news and media sites do that.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Makes sense, I don't use any of them, at all. I'm pretty sure there's a place where you can report such webpages for doing that though, though I don't know where at the moment.

Edit: possibly this one

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 48 points 1 year ago

That's fine. People who don't care about cookies will accept them anyway and those who do care about cookies will know not to visit that site anymore.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I feel like people would have responded to this meme better if you didn't depict the European Union as an NPC

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 year ago (3 children)

So far I’ve only seen small US newspaper who did this. Is anyone angry about this?

[–] Oddbin 27 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There's a medical website that appears in top searches (forget the name) that does it too but yeah, mostly seems to be news websites but not the big ones. In most cases Unlock Origin or the like can hide the panel they throw up to choose if you really need the info or archive or 12ft ladder can get you the info.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] DeriHunter 24 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Serious question: I know that there are tracking cookies and the user should be able to decline those,but most sites have an auth cookie that stores you're credentials. The devs can store it in a different place like local storage but thats really unsecured.what can the devs do in this situation when the user decline all cookies?

[–] [email protected] 44 points 1 year ago

The EU is not stupid. They categorized cookies into the necessary ones for site-usage and those that aren't. So developers just categorize their session cookie (rightfully) as necessary and that's it.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The eu rules are mostly about unnecessary cookies. Most web devs just copied whatever everyone else was doing and now there's this standard of having to accept cookies but the EU doesn't really enforce it like that

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] KevinNoodle 11 points 1 year ago

Usually the prompts are specifically for tracking cookies, not essential ones for login. Alternatives without cookies:

  • URL sessions
  • Tokens
  • OAuth/OIDC third party
  • Local/Session Storage (ditto - mind the risks)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago

I generally agree with the statment under that image and it's certainly a funny meme but also Illegal, sadly the enforcment is a joke but that's not really the laws fault!

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago

Nearly all of these are illegal, but sadly there is little enforcement when it comes to this. (Tracking must be opt-in, not opt-out. Ignoring a banner must be interpreted as declining. Opting out must be a simple option, not navigating a complex and misleading menus. The users choice applies to any form of tracking, not just cookies...)

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's literally the point though...

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›