this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2023
942 points (95.1% liked)

Memes

45753 readers
2441 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 118 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I think this one unites all the genders. Fuck Reagan!

[–] [email protected] 85 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Unless you’re assigned conservative at birth; ACAB if you will.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago

You are a true wordsmith

[–] [email protected] 103 points 1 year ago (2 children)

don't leave out his destruction of the media as a balanced source of information when he signed the veto that killed the Fairness Doctrine. fuck that guy so hard.

[–] Godric 65 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Don't forget trickle down economics, we can also thank Ronnie R for that too! And ignoring the AIDS epidemic for years, because that only hurt "the coloreds and gays".

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] _bug0ut 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

My understanding is that it only applied to broadcast networks and without serious reworking, we'd still have the misinformation we have on cable networks and the internet. I could see them maybe extending it to cable networks by now, had it stayed in place, but good luck policing it across thousands of websites putting out the tripe they do.

The Fairness Doctrine seems like it was potentially the right tool for the job at the time it was implemented, and perhaps killed way too early, but I'm not sure it would fit comfortably in the modern world.

(Oh, but yeah - fuck Reagan for nuking it when he did and the mountain of other shit he did to drag us onto this miserable fucking timeline, of course.)

[–] Feirdro 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I lived in a rural area in the the 80s and 90s, and much of the evil we have today began with Rush Limbaugh. We would be in such a better place today if the law had stopped that bastard.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 102 points 1 year ago

Girls being Based

[–] [email protected] 45 points 1 year ago (18 children)

I always hate the "time traveller kills Hitler" stchick.

Killing Reagan does not change the political climate that allowed him to rise to power. In fact killing him could have made things worse for the USA. See 9/11 for a recent example.

[–] [email protected] 53 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah but it will be funny.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Also, Trickle-Down-Assassination... Every president after him would get shot too. Or not I dunno

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

It’s what happened after Lincoln. All presidents since him have not survived or are expected to die within the next few decades.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I wouldn't have killed Regan had I gone back in time, I would've gone a bit further back and after Rockerfeller got forced to sell standard oil, I would've offed him just before he was able to use the money he gained to form Chicago University and it's dreaded Chicago school of economics.(home to the ludicrous idea that the free market will regulate itself) Which I think had even worse consequences than Reganomics, if not directly influencing it.

At the very least, it would've likely extended the 30 years worth of post Roosevelt economic prosperity that decreased wage gaps, and actively created the middle class at least a bit longer before some other rich butthole got the same or a similar idea as Rockerfeller.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's called the University of Chicago. And yup, it continues to be a vicious pile of shit to this day, fucking over the vulnerable communities around it, providing substandard health care and sitting on a 10 billion dollar endowment that they refuse to use to either raise employee wages or lower tuition. (Fun fact: They're projected to become the first university in the country to have six-figure tuition.)

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

The problem isn't even free market concepts, it's the idea that you can advocate for a free market in a highly regulated country. When the definition of corporation is controlled and liability is removed from individuals you can't have a free market.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Take him out before he becomes an actor. Oh no random nobody in California got hit by a car. Too bad drunk driving is still legal 🤣

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That assumes you're only pulling off one time-travel assassination. What if you just keep doing them until the lack of the relevant people shifts the political climate by itself? Like in the "go back and kill Hitler (or just push him onto a different life path at a young age, if you have time travel, you can probably remove someone as a leader without just killing them), sure, maybe a different fascist rises in Germany instead, but if you take out that one too, and the next one, and the next, eventually someone who isn't a fascist will manage to get into office, or if you keep it up long enough, the german fascist movement will run out of viable leaders, and cease to be a major factor in the political climate of the time.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (4 children)

And then you change history so much that you were never born..

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

To be honest, going back and just taking Hitler or any similarly historically important person out of the equation is likely enough to do that, for most people, given the impact he had on the world, or at the least removes the reason for you to go back in time, so presumably if you're seriously contemplating doing this, whatever time travel mechanism you have going on probably has to be one where you are shielded from the consequences of whatever changes you make anyway.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Viking_Hippie 15 points 1 year ago

Killing Reagan does not change the political climate that allowed him to rise to power

You're both right and wrong. While it wouldn't change the circumstances that led to his election directly, he himself played a big part in CREATING those circumstances and perpetuating them to the point of the Trump cult eventually becoming all but inevitable.

Who knows? Maybe if we got rid of Reagan early enough, Bush the elder would work towards the "open borders" he argued for during the primary debate against him.

That's just one of dozens if not hundreds of issues where Bush the elder becoming potus earlier would, while not great, be much preferable to 8 years of Reagan. Hell, who knows? Might have made a more left wing candidate than Clinton the next president!

PS: everyone seems to be forgetting that, on top of his OWN bad policy choices, the country was pretty much run by the throat goat drug demonizer Nancy and his favorite astrologer towards the end where the dementia had made him incapable of doing much himself.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

The trick with Reagan is to shoot him at the end of his union leader period, in a way that incriminates a conservative group.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Just go a bit farther back and teach Bonzo how to do the deed.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Based as fuck and Reddit offending.

Love it

[–] EdibleFriend 5 points 1 year ago

How would it offend reddit?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Iron_Lynx 10 points 1 year ago

Girls, D'ya have some spare bullets for Thatcher? And Rutte?

[–] unphazed 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

All you really need to do is make sure the 1939 Code of the Secret Service never gets made. Jerry Parr never joins, no one saves Reagan.

[–] AngryCommieKender 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That or talk Taft into conceding the Republican nomination in 1912 so that Roosevelt would have overseen WWI, rather than one of the guys that literally wrote Southern Revisionist bullshit, among many other things.

Fuck Woodrow Wilson with a Louisville Slugger.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

Is this girl power?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Context about what this guy did?

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 year ago (1 children)

As a senator of California: enacted the beginning of gun control to stop black men from arming themselves against racist corrupt cops

As a president: crippling the American middle class to enrich the upper class wealthy elites and solidifying their control

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Ahh So fuck him. No gender gap involved

[–] 9point6 21 points 1 year ago

He did a lot of shitty things, but IMO the biggest was that between him and Thatcher in the UK, they shifted the western world economy towards neoliberalism. The biggest problem with that, amongst many other problems, is that it prioritised short term gains over long term sustainability.

That bit about it not being sustainable is why everything has been getting gradually shittier since about 2010. It's hard to look back on the last 40 years and not see the ideology as being much more than an asset strip of our public sectors and a carte blanche for bankers to fuck about without consequence.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (11 children)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

forget reagan, who invented the time machine?

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] Godric 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

One visited the Romans and saw what wonders the first Western Empire wrought. The other fella fully sold out everyone to the wealthy. Guess who gets shot!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] nixpa 8 points 1 year ago

Extremely accurate and based

[–] Etterra 5 points 1 year ago

Nah, I'm with the ladies here. Rome had it's pros and cons, but Reagan should have been catapulted into some lava the first time he said he was getting into politics.

load more comments
view more: next ›