this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2023
468 points (98.1% liked)

Linux

45460 readers
1224 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

What use to be the PPA that allowed Ubuntu users to use native .deb packages for Firefox has recently changed to the same meta package that forces installation of Snap and the Firefox snap package.

I am having to remove the meta package, then re-uninstall the snap firefox, then re-uninstall Snap, then install pin the latest build I could get (firefox_116.0.3+build2-0ubuntu0.22.04.1~mt1_arm64.deb) to keep the native firefox build.

I'm so done with Ubuntu.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 140 points 10 months ago (25 children)

Yeah they’re all in on snaps. Vote with your distro choice.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 10 months ago (1 children)

What I don't get is why. What with the recent Red Hat debacle one would think Canonical would make a stronger case as opposed to force feeding the issue.

[–] [email protected] 46 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Because it’s canonical’s thing they’re marketing to server markets

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 30 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I'm afraid they'll break off Debian one day. Supporting snap is one thing, sabotaging well established user cases (apt installing deb, not being a snap prozy) is another.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (23 replies)
[–] [email protected] 79 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Imagine having to fight your OS to do what you want. True Windows experience.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 70 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (6 children)

You know what, enough is enough. Snaps run like shit in my system (IDK/DC why), I hate companies forcing their shit down my throat, and I was planning a clean reinstall anyway from Ubuntu 20.04 to 22.04. Might as well use the opportunity to go back to Debian. Or Mint. Or Mint Debian Edition. Who knows.

Next on the news, Ubuntu ("humanity") gets renamed to Amasimba ("shit"). /s

[–] [email protected] 14 points 10 months ago (4 children)

Feeling bold? Try MenuetOS, it even claims to have an http client.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 10 months ago

TempleOS and give it a try. The prophet Terry will be smilling from the Heaven TempleOS

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] iopq 47 points 10 months ago (3 children)

I warned you guys. "It's so easy, just do these three steps if you don't like snaps" but then later they tighten the vise

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 47 points 10 months ago
[–] [email protected] 45 points 10 months ago (3 children)

There's a simple reason why Mozilla/canonical does this and that is security fixes. Due to the difference in support cycles of Firefox and Ubuntu LTS versions fixes would have to be manually backported to the system Firefox version and newer versions won't run due to library dependencies. Snap solves all of that.

Don't get me wrong though, snap is still terrible, but other than flatpak or doing the work of backporting it's the only option to get security fixes to Ubuntu

[–] thalience 16 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Previous to the switch to snaps, Ubuntu was providing the latest version of Firefox built for each supported Ubuntu release. I'm sure this was more work, but the older system library version issue was not a blocker.

Edit: in fact, Mozilla still provides an apt repo with Firefox deb packages built for each supported Ubuntu release.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 39 points 10 months ago

There are several high quality community run distributions which aren't beholden to corporate tools.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 10 months ago (3 children)

LibreWolf is a Firefox fork with features removed which we don't want (Telemetry, Pocket, ...) and a few (privacy) features enabled (which can be deactivated if they're too annoying). I didn't had any issues with Firefox extensions as well.

I'm currently using it on Debian and it runs smoothly. Recent Ubuntu versions are also supported and you can install them via your package manager, see here.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 26 points 10 months ago (18 children)

I like the approach Pop OS takes. Their software store lets you choose between deb or flatpak when you install software. I've had issues with flatpak versions of some software, and flipping to the deb package usually fixes it.

[–] thekerker 15 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Fedora does the same thing where you can choose between RPM or Flatpak. The only flatpak package I've ever had problems with was OnlyOffice, and the issue was that the scaling was blown way out of proportions. Switching to the RPM version resolved that.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)
[–] Dagamant 25 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I stopped using Ubuntu because of snap a while ago. I tend to run Linux on older machines and flat packs tend to take much longer to load than native apps. I get that they have their purpose but I would prefer to choose to use rather than be forced. I’m currently trying out POP_OS! and it’s a welcome flavor of Ubuntu

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 25 points 10 months ago (1 children)

If you don't embrace snaps just don't use Ubuntu.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Hence me now moving off of it.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 23 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (16 children)

Hot take: PPAs suck and snaps/flatpaks are better.

With PPAs, inevitably some repo that hasn’t been updated since 2015 causes dependency conflicts and you have to sit there and troubleshoot, or pick between the software you need and actually having an OS that’s not EOL. With snaps, you can keep your decade old dependencies all bundled up and still upgrade your system even if the package maintainer has abandoned it.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 10 months ago

The issue people have with snaps isn't the containerization or the bundles, but the proprietary backend. There is no way to point the snaps at a different store other than the one canonical controls. Canonicals forcing snaps on people pisses a lot of people off because it's a blatant power grab, an attempt to get people dependent on something they have control over in a microsoft-esque move. Flatpaks and docker don't have that issue.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 10 months ago

Hot take: it doesn't feel nice to have a change forced.

It should be the personal preference of the user to decide whether to use native or snap/flatpak. If native package manager decide to not support the package any longer it would be better to make user aware and stop maintaining app, than to install a snap package. This is a user's decision.

Also this can have far reaching consequences. Imagine you cannot use/install snaps on your machine due some reason, what now?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 10 months ago

I tried so hard to embrace snaps and flatpak. I really did. But the snap service kept bogging down. Installs specifically of Firefox were ponderously slow to start up. And ultimately I ended up with regular installs, PPAs, snaps, and flatpaks all together with their own daemons, update paths, and quirks sucking up my system bandwidth and emotional resources. System was constantly slow. Felt like I was running Windows.

I flipped over to endeavours, really enjoying it. Feels like Ubuntu did in the earlier years. Great support community, lots of choice, but a straightforward path to just using your system if that's what you're there for. And the same computer runs a good 25% faster.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Valid opinion and immutable distros like silverblue might be where the future is headed.

It's not the point though, I'm not going with a distro that tries to force their proprietary solution on me.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Time to switch to Mint ( or Debian ). I have not like Ubuntu for a while but this forced match to snaps seems too much.

I use Arch myself. I have been considering trying Debian Stable with Distrobox / Arch. The stability of Debian with a totally current and massive package inventory ( thank you AUR ) sounds like perhaps the best of all worlds.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 10 months ago

yay! another company damaging itself!

[–] [email protected] 19 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

I'm a bit confused to see that the hate falls entirely on ubuntu. Isn't the change in the ppa of mozillateam, ~~owned by mozilla~~?

Edit: It seems that mozillateam is actually ubuntu.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Frellwit 19 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I use the binary provided by Mozilla at https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/

I even wrote an installation script that takes care of it all. (For amd64, not arm64. I'm not sure if they provide a stand-alone arm build.)

[–] [email protected] 13 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

TIL about desktop-file-edit.

I’ve been doing desktop files by hand for years.

My favorite thing about the Mozilla binary is that it auto updates just like Windows, as long as you have write permissions.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Ubuntu was my first-ever training-wheels gateway to Linux. I started from 8.04 Hardy Heron, and it felt like such a counter-culture move back then and I wanted to be part of the 'cool' edgy goth kids that DGAF about the mainstream normies.

15 years later, I still daily-drive windows, but I have many linux boxes for various specialist use-cases, mainly for scripting or self-hosting services, and still have 22.04 server versions running here and there. But this will be my last version of Ubuntu, and the only reason its still there is because migrating them is going to be no fun.

The Ubuntu today feels like a completely different animal than when I started. My breaking point was the 'upgrade to pro' message on every apt run. I DON'T WANT TO SIGN UP FOR YET ANOTHER METERED ACCOUNT. I use Linux to escape all the mainstream commercialism and monetization once in a while when I'm up for it. Next thing I know, it starts popping up in Linux OS's and even terminals asking me to login with an account so that I can be monetized.

Don't get me wrong, I know people need to eat and companies need revenue streams to pay their staff. Linux was my occasional escape back to my engineering and tinkering roots, but corporatism is creeping in like what happens to all good things (eventually).

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 10 months ago (19 children)

Seems like Canonical wants to push snaps now really hard. I hope that Flathub soon implements its payment structure, before companies flock to the Canonical store.

load more comments (19 replies)
[–] GustavoM 15 points 10 months ago

Ubuntu being Ubloatu.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 10 months ago (11 children)

What's up with the hate on snaps, again, please anyone?

[–] [email protected] 38 points 10 months ago (2 children)
  • There is only a single Snap server, and it is a proprietary one exclusive to Canonical
  • Upgrades are pushed in a mandatory fashion, which means things will break if a bad upgrade ever gets pushed
  • Snaps have about the same integration issues that Flatpaks have due to their sandboxing, but overcoming them is even harder due to lack of tools on the Snap side of things
  • Snaps are mostly Ubuntu-centric, and don't quite work on other distros
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] leo85811nardo 30 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (3 children)

For me it's the fact that Ubuntu forcefully shove snap into my system when I want the normal deb install with apt. I'm sure snap has gone better over the years but this is something that I absolutely hate. When I want to use snap/flatpak, I can use snap/flatpak install, and when I say apt install it should be deb install as it's supposed to be as a Debian variant. Linux tools has always been known for doing exactly what is told, whereas what Ubuntu is recently doing is the opposite of it

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 10 months ago

While I'm sure some people hate snap in general, most people simply hate being forced to use it. Or rather, bring forced to switch distro and reinstall everything.

[–] merthyr1831 13 points 10 months ago

Beyond the complaints about Canonical's hostility to Flatpak and other formats, but the real risk snap poses is that Canonical has a lot of control over the snap store, and lack of integration with distros beyond Ubuntu.

There's a vague promise of "new stores" and better integration with other distros but Flatpak is a truly open technology that gives you the option to install apps from ANY source and other distros are collaborating to improve it.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 10 months ago (1 children)

They are mostly Mozilla members, not Ubuntu members, who are responsible for the PPA. Are you sure, that your complaints and grievances are directed to the right address? See here: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Contacts

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 10 months ago

Yeah… For years I already suggested anything good but Ubuntu to those interested in trying Linux, but now I'm going to directly tell them not to touch it. Sure, you've got lots of online discussions from the past 20-ish years of people teaching each other how to install PPAs for up-to-date versions of programs or drivers and that's sweet. But how about a distro where that stuff is just available out of the box and one that doesn't force you to use snaps as if they didn't cause issues left and right?

load more comments
view more: next ›