this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2023
302 points (94.7% liked)

News

22600 readers
5987 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

When asked about the federal government’s role, 41% of Americans say it should encourage the production of nuclear power.

Let's get those new construction contracts signed!

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Cool, now we just need to convince Americans 50 years ago of that and we might manage to save the planet yet.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

You're probably right, we're fucked. May as well go harpoon some right whales.

[–] schroedingershat 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Fossil fuel and monopoly utility owners desperately trying to direct resources away from the thing killing their profits to something they know is ineffective with astroturfing campaign. Fox news watchers parroting what they're told.

News at 11

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The one trick big carbon doesn't want you to know about!

Confuse the only contenders to fight each other and maximize your profit while they decide whose "right"

Don't forget to like and subscribe

[–] schroedingershat 5 points 1 year ago (11 children)

There's only one contender, buddy. This "if only you'd stop fighting and just direct 10x the resources at a non-solution" schtick is even stupider than the rest of the lies.

The nuclear industry is owned by the same people as big carbon. The only people parroting this garbage are the same people that have been pushing coal and climate denial.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Now if only they can get the NIMBYs in Nevada to support yucca mountain so we have a safe place to store the waste.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

"What do they do with these after we seal them?"

"I hear they dump 'em in an abandoned chalk mine and cover them with cement."

"I hear they're sending them to one of those southern states where the governor's a crook."

"Either way, I'm sleeping good tonight!"

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Will only happend if Las Vegas runs out of water and lose population. Then they'll want the related jobs, income, and tax revenue. Until LV dies, it'll never happen.

[–] schroedingershat 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why is it on Nevada to deal with your shit (and the costs of cleanup when you fuck up like WIPP or the German repository)?

If it's a solved issue, then execute the solution where you make the mess.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] reddig33 8 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I don’t mind more nuclear if it’s done in a modern and safe fashion. The US has a tendency to build old fashioned water cooled reactors that output nuclear waste that we have to find a place for. And we do stupid things like building them on fault lines and flood zones.

Why not build a pebble reactor? Or molten salt?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

The current gen nuclear reactors are the only ones that have a chance of being built with all the known drawbacks. And even if we started building them like crazy, it would still not be enough to meaningfully contribute to mitigating climate change. All the other designs, like Thorium or SMRs are just pure science fiction and at best decades away from being viable.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] schroedingershat 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If this magical reliable, cheap, abundant, fast to deploy molten salt handling technology existed, the people with it would be dominating the storage industry with carnot batteries on every abandoned (and active) coal plant as well as the solar industry with 2c/kWh CSP.

[–] Ryumast3r 1 points 1 year ago

They are funding modern reactor research/development. One example is x energy.

https://x-energy.com/

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

The reason not to build those things is we don't know how yet? Not well, for power production.

There is a clear path forward. The only place where nuclear fits in the puzzle is specific locations where wind and solar are non-viable.

[–] Coldgoron 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Well its not really a choice with climate change about to wreck most things.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

Yeah cooling them with river water won't work in the summer pretty soon and since it takes almost 10 years to build it really isn't a reasonable choice if you see how many renewables you can rollout in that time with that money

[–] DougHolland 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, that's what most people fail to grok. This summer, 2023, will be the coolest summer for the rest of your life. In frightfully few years, weather catastrophes will be as commonplace as gas station stickups, and all of the 'modern conveniences' will be doubtful at best.

The internet will be frequently and increasingly unplugged, highways will buckle, flying will be only for oligarchs, hospitals will be amateur efforts, Hollywood will be in flames, pro baseball will be untenable, and wild hoards will roam what used to be the cities, searching for food.

In this mix, it's laughable to imagine there'll be full, stable, well-trained staffing at nuclear power plants.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Interesting that you included baseball on that list

[–] DougHolland 4 points 1 year ago

The whole comment was me retyping something I'd texted to my oblivious Republican nephew a few days ago, and he's a baseball fan. :)

[–] afraid_of_zombies 4 points 1 year ago

Some good news for once. All it took was the hottest year on record and a global plague that wiped out a bunch of the elderly anti-science crowd.

Maybe we can build a few more before we all fucking die

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Sign me the fuck up for nuclear, especially sodium reactors. I want it in my backyard, especially if it means I get a fucking excellent deal on a house. I hate the smoke every summer and the extreme weather and the lack of snow for our glaciers.

[–] nyoooom 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Damn, those are some fine looking swimming pools

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

They're heated (and cooled) swimming pools

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Cool nuclear power is in again.

[–] Coreidan 2 points 1 year ago

A tad too late. Those nuclear power plants won’t mean much by the time they are built

[–] ThwaitesAwaits 2 points 1 year ago

Good! We need more nuclear now more than ever.

load more comments
view more: next ›