this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2023
107 points (97.3% liked)

politics

19119 readers
5050 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The group of conservatives formally announced they would oppose a clean short-term spending fix, meaning Kevin McCarthy will have an even harder time keeping the government open come fall.

“In the eventuality that Congress must consider a short-term extension of government funding through a Continuing Resolution, we refuse to support any such measure that continues Democrats’ bloated COVID-era spending and simultaneously fails to force the Biden Administration to follow the law and fulfill its most basic responsibilities,” the Freedom Caucus said in a statement.

In addition to vowing to oppose a so-called clean short-term funding bill, the Freedom Caucus is also planning to vote against any spending legislation that doesn’t meet certain priorities of the party’s right flank. That would mean including, according to the announcement, a sweeping GOP border bill that has stalled in the Senate; addressing “the unprecedented weaponization” of the Justice Department and FBI and ending “woke” Defense Department policies.

An official position from the Freedom Caucus requires the support of at least 80 percent of its members.

The group also said it would oppose a “blank check” for Ukraine after the Biden administration’s new request for billions in additional aid. McCarthy is likely to face pressure from beyond the Freedom Caucus to separate any Ukraine spending from a short-term government funding bill, amid growing skepticism within the conference about continuing to provide military help.

top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] lusciousgreen 60 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I feel like the only thing the freedom caucus is actually achieving is tanking Americans credit rating by holding America's budget hostage. Is there more than that? What is actually a long term goal they are hoping to achieve, or is this just another " we are not going to let the left get away with this" moment. Such a fucking joke.

[–] jeffw 53 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Long-term goal is a return to gilded age policy, where the rich can do whatever the fuck they want and nobody complains about their child working 14 hour days in the factory

[–] baldingpudenda 23 points 1 year ago

So... Arkansas. When I think of great, flourishing states, I always think of Arkansas first

[–] Sanctus 44 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I read their statement. I don't want to live on clown world anymore. We are fucking terraforming Earth into hell and the only thing these fucken mouth breathers can screech is "woke".

[–] c_jay 6 points 1 year ago

Hell's not gonna build itself

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

McCarthy can do a CR with Dem votes. He just has to decide if has the guts. They'll stamp their feet, but they have no replacement Speaker.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

Mccarthy was neutered on the second vote for speaker. It'd be nice to be proven wrong however.

[–] Burn_The_Right 2 points 1 year ago

He definitely, definitely will not appeal to Dem votes. He's a conservative. They are incapable of intelligent behavior. Whatever the worst decision is will be what he chooses.

[–] TheJims 9 points 1 year ago

So just like terrorists making their ransom demands for the release of hostages.

[–] Astroturfed 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They just need to call their bluff again. The shutdown ruined them with voters last time. Just let them do it. People see through their bullshit.

[–] jeffw 2 points 1 year ago

The last shutdown was under a GOP president