this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2023
557 points (95.7% liked)

Technology

59669 readers
4135 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


The Sotheby's auction house has been named as a defendant in a lawsuit filed by investors who regret buying Bored Ape Yacht Club NFTs that sold for highly inflated prices during the NFT craze in 2021.

"Sotheby's representations that the undisclosed buyer was a 'traditional' collector had misleadingly created the impression that the market for BAYC NFTs had crossed over to a mainstream audience," the lawsuit claimed.

Investors previously sued Bored Ape creator Yuga Labs, four company executives, and various celebrity promoters including Paris Hilton, Gwyneth Paltrow, Kevin Hart, Snoop Dogg, Serena Williams, Madonna, Jimmy Fallon, Steph Curry, and Justin Bieber.

The lawsuit said it turned out the auction buyer was now-bankrupt crypto exchange FTX, whose founder Sam Bankman-Fried is in jail awaiting trial on criminal charges.

Ethereum blockchain transaction data shows that after the auction, "Sotheby's transferred the lot of BAYC NFTs to wallet address 0xf8e0C93Fd48B4C34A4194d3AF436b13032E641F3,77 which, upon information and belief, is owned/controlled by FTX," the complaint said.

"While the Executive Defendants made hundreds of millions of dollars, investors were left with NFTs worth a fraction of their artificially inflated value," the original version of the complaint in December said.


I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] eran_morad 5 points 1 year ago

A fool and his money…

[–] gcheliotis 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Some schadenfreude is definitely warranted, but the lawsuit may have merit.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think that's exactly right. It was a grift, after all.

I just don't understand how anyone could have fallen for it. Let alone people with this kind of money, who have all the information in the world at their fingertips. Is it just about them finding certain techbros charismatic? Ooh, they have money, I'd better give them my money so that I can have money too?

Flabbergasting, the whole lot of it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] silentdon 3 points 1 year ago

Wow who would've thought

[–] Fubar91 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

2020's the decade of the .jpg wars. Lmao.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

“Do I look like I know what a jay-peg is? I just want a picture of a got dang hot dog!”

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Yeah. They really should've bought the lion!

Seriously though. This was so obvious right from the start. I can't believe how gullible and naive people are.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›