this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2023
774 points (97.1% liked)

Fuck Cars

9481 readers
467 users here now

This community exists as a sister community/copycat community to the r/fuckcars subreddit.

This community exists for the following reasons:

You can find the Matrix chat room for this community here.

Rules

  1. Be nice to each other. Being aggressive or inflammatory towards other users will get you banned. Name calling or obvious trolling falls under that. Hate cars, hate the system, but not people. While some drivers definitely deserve some hate, most of them didn't choose car-centric life out of free will.

  2. No bigotry or hate. Racism, transphobia, misogyny, ableism, homophobia, chauvinism, fat-shaming, body-shaming, stigmatization of people experiencing homeless or substance users, etc. are not tolerated. Don't use slurs. You can laugh at someone's fragile masculinity without associating it with their body. The correlation between car-culture and body weight is not an excuse for fat-shaming.

  3. Stay on-topic. Submissions should be on-topic to the externalities of car culture in urban development and communities globally. Posting about alternatives to cars and car culture is fine. Don't post literal car fucking.

  4. No traffic violence. Do not post depictions of traffic violence. NSFW or NSFL posts are not allowed. Gawking at crashes is not allowed. Be respectful to people who are a victim of traffic violence or otherwise traumatized by it. News articles about crashes and statistics about traffic violence are allowed. Glorifying traffic violence will get you banned.

  5. No reposts. Before sharing, check if your post isn't a repost. Reposts that add something new are fine. Reposts that are sharing content from somewhere else are fine too.

  6. No misinformation. Masks and vaccines save lives during a pandemic, climate change is real and anthropogenic - and denial of these and other established facts will get you banned. False or highly speculative titles will get your post deleted.

  7. No harassment. Posts that (may) cause harassment, dogpiling or brigading, intentionally or not, will be removed. Please do not post screenshots containing uncensored usernames. Actual harassment, dogpiling or brigading is a bannable offence.

Please report posts and comments that violate our rules.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 93 points 10 months ago (3 children)

SUV, Truck, SUV, SUV, SUV, SUV, sedan, SUV, SUV, SUV, SUV.

The culture problem around big vehicles we've created with bad regulation and aggressive marketing is depressing.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

It isn't just a culture problem, it's a tragedy of the commons.

When you're surrounded by giant vehicles, the only way to ~~be~~ feel safe and see the road is to have a giant vehicle.

[–] schroedingershat 9 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (14 children)

The only way to feel safe. The really big ego-support vehicles are no safer than a subcompact to be inside of, but they are far more likely to kill your own family.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] hglman 6 points 10 months ago

Its deadly.

[–] [email protected] 79 points 10 months ago (1 children)

So glad they put that thick protective white line there so I know I won’t be hit 🥰

[–] [email protected] 23 points 10 months ago (2 children)

It’ll be super protective when it snows!

[–] Mr_Blott 6 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Ironically enough, this is how the pavements are in the ski resort I live in. It's a "shared zone", pedestrians have the same rights as vehicles. It slows everyone down because nobody knows when the next braying snowboarder trust-fund baby is going to stagger out in front of you.

Oh and as for the snow, we have adorable little mini snowploughs for the pedestrian bit

Edit to add pic -

Of course it uploaded upside down

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 57 points 10 months ago (1 children)

What in the stupid is this?

[–] [email protected] 34 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Cheaper than a sidewalk, apparently.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 10 months ago (2 children)

The cost being the life of pedestrians? This is insane.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 10 months ago

That doesn't show up on the balance sheet 😬

[–] brillekake 10 points 10 months ago (1 children)

What do you mean? The white line keeps the cars out..

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago

It's an impenetrable force field apparently.

[–] [email protected] 39 points 10 months ago (1 children)

If you are walking you're either poor or up to no good, in both cases we don't want you around these parts. Oh, your kids need to walk? Don't be lazy and DRIVE them where they need to go!

[–] [email protected] 12 points 10 months ago

Don’t be lazy and DRIVE

For the briefest of moments I felt a spark of blinding hot rage in my heart. Now I am left with the lingering feeling of wanting to smash my head against a rock.

Thank you for that experience.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Why even allow people in this neighborhood? Just have cars and no people

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago

Don't worry, self driving cars will get us there eventually

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Coreidan 24 points 10 months ago

Wow it’s like you guys are trying as hard as possible to not put in sidewalks.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 10 months ago (4 children)

This what I hate about North America. Non walkable neighbourhoods.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 10 months ago

Next they'll eliminate the stripe and put up share-the-road signs with the stick figure

[–] [email protected] 21 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Is that a pedestrian symbol or the chalk outline of a pedestrian who got hit?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Piecemakers3Dprints 19 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I'm just wondering why that corpse was wearing such an unhealthy corset.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 months ago

Unrealistic beauty standards. The corset is the reason they died.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 10 months ago (5 children)

What dystopian fuckery is this?

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] herrwoland 14 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

More like it was a guy who got flattened by a car and got painted over, because that's exactly what's going to happen if you try and walk there

[–] njordomir 13 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I keep seeing joggers in my area choosing the bike lane over the sidewalk, presumably because asphalt is softer than concrete sidewalks. If paving a ped lane next to the bike lane is what it takes to isolate these wrong-way bike-lane-jogging scufflaws, then let's just do it and be done with it. We can cannibalize a car lane to make it happen. >:-)

[–] schroedingershat 17 points 10 months ago (4 children)

Sidewalks in car-brained areas are super dangerous to jog on. People backing out of their driveway or turning across the road at 10-20km/h without looking. Trip hazards. Ankle destroying driveway cutouts or curved surfsces. Uneven grading.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 10 months ago (5 children)

Imagine seeing this when house hunting and still buying the house. You'd have to have worms in your brain to want one of these ugly McMansions with no sidewalk

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Who would use this? Wouldn't you either walk on the grass or clearly in the middle of the street?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TheRedSpade 11 points 10 months ago (3 children)

You've heard of bike gutters

No I haven't.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 10 months ago

Soooo...a sidewalk without the extra pavement?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 10 months ago

Wow, I sure am glad that the kerb is there to protect those blades of grass!

[–] J12 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I would never live somewhere with no sidewalks.

[–] Aux 6 points 10 months ago

Most of Britain doesn't have sidewalks. But there's a slight difference in the law... In Britain, pedestrians have priority on ALL roads at ALL times (except for dual carriageways, obv). Pedestrians can even legally cross the road on red light as all traffic control signs and lights are merely suggestions for pedestrians and not a requirement.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Who the hell designed this? I want to see the person who made this burn in hell

[–] atticus88th 5 points 10 months ago

They are probably laughing on their yacht right now.

[–] andlewis 7 points 10 months ago

I’m guessing they call this “multiuse”? And I’m guessing it gets filled with parked cars immediately.

[–] rifugee 6 points 10 months ago (3 children)

In my opinion, if this was done in a community that was not designed for sidewalks (the house are very close to the curb), then it's better than nothing. I'd like to see some bollards or post reflectors or something, but at least there is some effort.

On the other hand, if this is a new community and this is the sidewalk "solution" then fuck them.

Ideally we would have a car free utopia, but that doesn't happen overnight, so any step forward, even if it's a shuffle, is good, I think.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago

Poor Polish village style infrastrucutre, now in your nearest city! (Authentic hole ridden roads not included)

What hell would this be to walk in, jesus christ...

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago

You can be lying inside this line just like that guy!

load more comments
view more: next ›