this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2023
351 points (98.6% liked)

Asklemmy

43755 readers
2136 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Personally, I want nothing to do with them and I'm not willing to give them the benefit of the doubt. I moved to the Fediverse to get away from all these corpos.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Meta is a corporation with a really horrible track record

and even if they didn't, it's still a corporation; it only cares for profit

I have very negative opinions on them joining

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We would be opening the door to allow a large corporation to do what they've done with open source for a while. They'll privatize the public commons.

But all this work [GPL licensing] was ridiculed. Microsoft, through Github, Google and Apple pushed for MIT/BSD licensed software as the open source standard. This allowed them to use open source components within their proprietary closed products. They managed to make thousands of free software developers work freely for them. And they even received praise because, sometimes, they would hire one of those developers (like it was a "favour" to the community while it is simply business-wise to hire smart people working on critical components of your infrastructure instead of letting them work for free). The whole Google Summer of Code, for which I was a mentor multiple years, is just a cheap way to get unpaid volunteers mentor their future free or cheap workforce.

Our freedoms were taken away by proprietary software which is mostly coded by ourselves. For free. We spent our free time developing, debugging, testing software before handing them to corporations that we rever, hoping to maybe get a job offer or a small sponsorship from them. Without Non-copyleft Open Source, there would be no proprietary MacOS, OSX nor Android. There would be no Facebook, no Amazon. We created all the components of Frankenstein’s creature and handed them to the evil professor.

This article is actually pretty great.

https://ploum.net/2023-06-19-more-rms.html

And for emphasis:

We created all the components of Frankenstein’s creature and handed them to the evil professor.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

They can fuck right off.

All they'll do is centralize the decentralized.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

Nope. Just nope. It'll be the death of the Fediverse.

[–] oryx 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mean everyone could just not federate with them, right?

[–] Gradually_Adjusting 8 points 1 year ago
[–] megane_kun 11 points 1 year ago

Meta is cancer, it turns everything it touches into medical biohazard. It gives voices to the worst of society, and gives them space to organize. It devalues information available out there by diluting it with useless crap, and worse, it makes shit look as valuable as well-researched and well-thought-out pieces.

However, having said all that, I'm torn as to what I could personally do about a meta-owned Mastodon instance.

While I can certainly contribute my voice telling instances, especially my home instance, to defederate from them, I can still see how even an isolated Meta instance can do damage. There's nothing stopping Meta from having their own instance, nor other instance owners from federating with them. Even defederating with instances that have federated with the Meta instance would do damage by encouraging factionalism and the overall fracturing of the Fediverse.

The best way of dealing with cancer is to be eternally vigilant, eliminating them at their very roots. I am not sure how I, an ordinary user in one of the larger Mastodon instances, can help.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Embrace, extend, extinguish

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

for anyone not familiar:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Embrace,_extend,_and_extinguish

"Embrace, extend, and extinguish" (EEE), also known as "embrace, extend, and exterminate", is a phrase that the U.S. Department of Justice found that was used internally by Microsoft to describe its strategy for entering product categories involving widely used standards, extending those standards with proprietary capabilities, and then using those differences in order to strongly disadvantage its competitors.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This may be controversial, but I see this as a net-positive for the internet long-term. The more momentum the Fediverse has in terms of growth, the more incentive other services have to join it, and the more everyone on the internet can be on the same page. One of the worst aspects of the internet right now is that different services don't even speak the same language; there's so much fragmentation. The fediverse forces services to be about the quality of the service itself, rather than the quantity of the content being hosted.

[–] Olgratin_Magmatoe 12 points 1 year ago

I'd rather see incredibly slow growth rather than have a corporation in control.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

In general, it's great when companies embrace standards and open source. Though in the case of Microsoft, they just did it to gain the market share (embrace, extend, extinguish).

I'm under no illusion that they would be doing it out of the kindness of their hearts or desire to be compliant with standards.

But..i also don't think I can criticize them yet for wanting to do so.

[–] Xenxs 10 points 1 year ago

I will avoid this like the literal plague it is. I don't believe for a single moment they have good intentions. My guess is that some people at Meta have identified the fediverse as the future and they want to try and find a way to capitalise on it and possibly monopolise it.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

Lmao want nothing to do with them. One of the reasons I’m here is to escape these dogshit corpos

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

I don't know anything about it except for what you said, but yeah fuck them. I'd much rather donate my money (well, once I get a job that is) to a bunch of people to maintain a server and simply jump on another instance if anything weird happens than use another Meta's (or any other shitty corpo's) products

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

I’m here because I hate what meta and other companies are doing to the web, so I detest it.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Meta is developing a twitter like app called Threads which will implement ActivityPub.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

My problem with that is then the fediverse doesn't grow, meta controls the largest instance, and they make money off any posts that go viral here. I have to disagree for those reasons. They can go.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

And they’d probably build in things to a slightly off standard so it’s not fully interoperable and when people call them out they’ll say it’s an improvement and they’ll be making it public any day now pinkie swears.

[–] WolfhoundRO 8 points 1 year ago

They're trojan horse. We can't stop them from creating their own servers, but we can choose to defederate them. Up with the Anti-Meta Defederation Pact

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

They'll probably adopt, adapt, and extinguish. So no, fuck 'em.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think this is so interesting...

For a refreshing change, we have corporations coming to the users, not the other way around.

I'm deeply skeptical, but I'm glad communities and hubs have the power to block them outright.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Pros

  • more attention to the Fediverse and all the advancement that may bring with it.
  • If the Fediverse ever becomes mainstream corporations will end up with their own content on it so having Meta join would provides early insight on how the Fediverse may be effected by becoming mainstream.

Cons

  • Some instances may not have the server load to support being federated with Meta
  • There's a decent chance it hinders healthy growth (Like a Cuckoo hatchling that starves out the bird's actual children.)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

We know very little at this point. My view is “wait and see”. Little point in speculating about things now IMHO.

[–] HandOfDoom 6 points 1 year ago

I'm not ok with wanting the Fediverse to grow at all costs. Meta's userbase is shit, the company is shit, zuckerberg is shit. Meta is becoming irrelevant and I don't want to help them, let them slowly rot.

[–] ItsYourBoyHalo 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If they join the Fediverse I am leaving. We have made the Fediverse to get away from coorporations like them, letting them join us will defeat the whole point of what we have.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Will be interesting.
More likely to be noticed by calckey,misskey/friendica users who are on platforms.more similar to Facebook. Probably noticed by Mastodon users.

Not sure if kbin/Lemmy users will notice. This is based on me not noticing posts from these servers on Mastodon, calckey etc

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›