this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2023
553 points (91.8% liked)

Programmer Humor

19315 readers
172 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 47 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

furiously clicking non actionable button

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Never heard of marquee or blink, eh?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

And why did you feel the need to bring up those suppressed memories?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wrong, annoying animations was Flash's thing. Javascript was made for annoying popups and alert boxes

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Also for these animated status line texts that were supposed to show what's being loaded currently.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I was there for the first wave of SPAs, I even learned angularJs and Knockout. It did feel like a major atep forward, being able to make highly interactive applications. However, things quickly went off the rails when the tools stopped being about managing heavy client state, and became the default for everything, even when it ment using JavaScript to build extremely basic functionally browsers did natively with html, but extremely worse(e.g. navigation). The modern Web really is a victim of hype and trends.

Unless your app needs to work offline, or you have to manage dozens of constantly changing client side data points concurrently, your site doesn't need to be a big heavy js framework. My rule is if it looks like Google Maps, you need a SPA. if it looks like Gmail you need REST/HATEOS. and if it looks like google's mainpage, you need a server side rendering.

At some point you might see the light, and go back to making your websites simpler, but Im not hopeful. Until then I'm building the majority of things with HTMX and alpineJs.

[–] fidodo 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I make fully static sites using react

[–] AgentEnder 5 points 1 year ago

Yeah, I've personally been using react and vite-plugin-ssr to static render things and while there's been a few bumps it still feels pretty nice

[–] BobbyBandwidth 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] dis_honestfamiliar 10 points 1 year ago

That's JavaScript with extra steps.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Say that to the madlad who wrote a virtual machine in js that can boot Linux and Windows: https://bellard.org/jslinux/

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

Something something he could, something he should

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

I thought that's what GIF was created for... Even if the original introduction of it is saying something completely different.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Doing Odin Project now and the constant shiting on JS online is sort of crushing my motivation. 😫

[–] BrucePotality 30 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Don’t worry about, JS is a fine language and is used by all of the top companies. If you want to get a job as a software developer you have decent odds if you learn JS

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

As someone currently job hunting - native JS isn’t enough anymore. Everyone wants React devs. I see some posts for Vue or Angilar and sometimes even TypeScript but the vast majority want React coders now.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

Very true.
If you are learning JavaScript, typescript is absolutely worth learning as well.
React and Vue have some additional paradigms, but it is basically just JavaScript/typescript.
It's a lot to learn all in one step.

I guess it's like trying to learn C# and Unity all in one

[–] garyyo 26 points 1 year ago (13 children)

If you don't hate a programming language you simply haven't used it enough or are delusional. Every language sucks in its own special way, js ain't special.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

cue “if those kids could read they’d be very upset”

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

Don't let it get to you. This is mostly just a circlejerk by people who don't even use JS themselves.

[–] elbarto777 2 points 1 year ago

Don't listen to the javascript haters.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Honest answer: JS is a shitty language and I despise it. BUT you can learn a ton of stuff with that, all the features (loops, conditions, variables, etc.) that exist in other languages. You will hate JS one day too, but right now it's good to learn, and when you'll switch to other languages, you'll be happy you learned something.

So yes, JS sucks, but no, it won't be useless for your future. Keep on working, programming is really fun.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

Huh, page displays nothing without js.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Like, not creating annoying animations.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

css can do animations, and it's much more performant then js. I hate how over-used JavaScript is on "modern" websites.
some websites are even straight up unusable or don't display anything with js disabled....

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Some websites, JavaScript is necessary for doing things without overloading a server. Mostly SPAs/PWAs and such. I’m using Voyager for Lemmy right now, which needs JS, but it gives me a great experience.

But yeah, JS is often overused. Luckily, with new technologies coming out like Astro and HTMX, we should hopefully start seeing less JavaScript on pages that don’t need it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Still wayting for a native solution to AJAX.

No, not Java beans.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

htmx just generates js too

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

However, it uses a lot less JS. It’s only a few lines of JS to replace an HTML element, but a lot more to parse a bunch of JSON and then alter the HTML to reflect that.

[–] Ddhuud 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

~~only~~ original

load more comments
view more: next ›