this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2023
65 points (95.8% liked)

News

21721 readers
3583 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 49 points 11 months ago (1 children)

To fix the labour shortage, I point to wages.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 11 months ago (1 children)

This even makes sense in context of the article, my wife doesn't work because it makes no sense to go to work and dump all the money she'd make into child care.

[–] afraid_of_zombies -1 points 11 months ago

Work evenings. My wife did that when our kids were really young.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 11 months ago (2 children)

...why does the U.S. need more workers in the first place? With real wages being largely stagnant over the last four decades, who is producing what for whom?

[–] GiddyGap 11 points 11 months ago (2 children)

The US, like most other developed countries, needs a constant influx of workers because the population is getting older on average. Boomers will soon be completely out of the labor market, and the smaller, younger generations will not be able to sustain the economy and society without extra hands.

[–] MostlyBirds 5 points 11 months ago

Good. Sustaining an economy that exploits and disenfranchises the majority, or even a significant minority, is indefensible.

[–] MajorHavoc 5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Good summary.

It's times like this that I just want to stare at the Statue of Liberty in New York harbor, and just contemplate what kind of policy changes could possibly solve our upcoming labor shortage?

If only Lady Liberty could speak, she might have some ideas. I guess I will never know.

/s

Edit: I'm also a big fan of higher wages. And I suspect US immigration levels won't bounce back quite as high with a ploicy change, after years of racism in our news. We're going to feel that consequence pretty strongly, I suspect.

[–] Blamemeta 4 points 11 months ago

It's mainly because of the infinite growth paradigm outpacing the rate of population growth. If only investors had realistic goals, we could avoid all this.

[–] jesterraiin 17 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

That we rationalized taking away children, in their most important phase of development, from the most important entity for this phase, is the prime example for how we failed as the mankind.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The cost of childcare is absolutely insane. My wife is staying at home. She is looking for something part time to get some extra cash.

She got a position at a day care
Our child goes to the top of the list since she’s employed there
We do not get a discount on child care with her working there

Her monthly pay will be ~1100
Our monthly cost to put our daughter there will be $2000

It costs more for my wife to work than it would to be stay at home.

[–] GiddyGap 9 points 11 months ago

It's truly insane.

And it's mind boggling to me that there are so many great solutions that have been in use for decades in other developed countries, but the US refuses to take any cues, because that's "socialism" or whatever. It's tiresome.

[–] afraid_of_zombies 4 points 11 months ago

Economists are full of shit and suck banker bailout tits.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

What labour shortage? I thought Bidens been praising low unemployment.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Low unemployment is the logical consequence of a labor shortage.

That said, I don’t believe we’re in a labor shortage. We are experiencing the natural consequences of decades of stagnant wages and rising costs. Higher wages would pull more people into the market, but that would cut into profits so business leaders invent an imaginary “labor shortage” which requires government intervention.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago

Also... we had this pandemic thing and a shitton of people died and it is so weird to me how everyone seems to just pretend that didn't happen.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

There is also a problem that most of the jobs right now are unable to pay rent on their own, so some people are starting to work 2 jobs.

So whenever I hear record employment, I wonder what that statistic would be if it only counted people that worked a single job. How many people in our workforce only need one job to survive in this economy?

And how many people that work two jobs are still living paycheck to paycheck?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I dont see what the logic is. Low unemployment means more labour

[–] MostlyBirds 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Uh, no. I don't even know how you came to that conclusion. Low unemployment means a smaller pool of people to fill open positions.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Theres a pool of eligible workers, and low unemployment means more people in that pool are working. More total actual workers rather than potential.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

Unemployment rates are the rate of people looking for work, and higher rates usually indicate a lack of open jobs. Lower rates mean there are more jobs available. It does not necessarily mean there are more people in the labor force. That’s a separate metric. But even if more people are working, a labor shortage is still possible. Why? A shortage happens when there is more demand for something than there is supply, so it can happen at any level of supply, if there is enough demand. So even if there are more workers, if employers want to hire even more, there could be a shortage.