this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2025
612 points (98.9% liked)

World News

43578 readers
6050 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Canada will keep in place its retaliatory tariffs against US-made products as long as President Donald Trump persists with a trade war, said Mark Carney, the Canadian prime minister-designate.

top 49 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 18 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Donald Trump is incapable of respecting anything.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 hours ago

Yep. I'm really glad we're adapting to that early.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

If Project 2025 is to be believed then the goal is to remove tariffs on the US, including things like dairy, telcos, and banking. Which it will be interesting what that looks like if it does happen, I do wonder if things like cheese and cellular would be made more affordable via economies of scale.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

Canadians showing Trump you can put tariffs without shooting yourself in the foot.

Be careful, he might learn the trick. Or can he learn?

[–] DarkWinterNights 1 points 3 hours ago

Since he subcontracts all his thinking and none of his talking out of both sides of his mouth, I would assume someone somewhere must hire some at least half-competent analytics guy before it all becomes distorted through their cronyist chain of command.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 11 hours ago

Can Donald "when I look at myself in the first grade and I look at myself now, I’m basically the same" Trump learn? You tell me.

https://theweek.com/speedreads/575962/donald-trump-tells-biographer-hes-same-now-first-grade

[–] [email protected] 16 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (3 children)

But everybody said about Trumps tariffs, that the American people will have to pay them. Can somebody explain why Canada keeping the Tariffs is good then? Aren't it the Canadian people paying for them?

Honest question btw, I'm not trying to be snarky. I'm just a bit slow sometimes.

Edit: Thanks for the explanations, I think I have a better understanding now. Tariffs hurt the consumer and the foreign industrie, but Canadians are rdy to pay that price for their sovereignity.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

The Canadian Tariffs are targeted at certain goods that Canada knows it can ramp up production internally, or source from Europe/Asia. they are not broad tariffs on everything. It will cost some some, but there has been alot of thought to maximize pressure on American business while minimizing pressure on Canadian consumer.

[–] Soleos 16 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

You are correct, tariffs hurt everyone. The direct cost is paid by the importer not the exporter. Part of the reaction-turned propaganda point about the US is that American people will bear the brunt of the tariffs. This is because Trump/MAGA framed tariffs as a tax that other countries would pay the direct cost of, not the Americans importing the goods.

This led to a downplaying of how it would negatively affect the foreign industries exporting the goods, and apply political pressure on those countries. This is how tariffs usually work, you put tariffs on certain goods to apply economic/political pressure towards specific goals, e.g. tariffs on Chinese EVs to protect NA auto industry. This still hurts NA consumers in that they don't have access to cheap Chinese EVs, but gives NA auto a chance to catch up. Tariffs are a normal economic tool that can help with bringing industry back into your country, but it's a tricky balance.

Canada is under no illusions that we will have to pay tariffs on imported American goods. There's also a nationalist reaction to boycott American goods to an extent for starting this trade war, but Canadians will still hurt. The alternative would be to take it and submit to America's whims, which is not a real option.

This trade war is not within the norms of standard economic diplomacy/negotiation though, it's just unhinged chaos. IMO the chaos is the point, giving cover for Trump&friends to solidify complete control as they turn the US into an authoritarian regime and helps to bring American industries to heel under their rule.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 12 hours ago

I don't think they're saying it's good economics and yes, for the most part, we understand how these tariffs will affect us.

But there's a lot of anger at Trump here. Booing the American national anthem is not something we do lightly. I haven't seen people this united for a common cause for a long time. I regularly see people checking labels at grocery stores to avoid buying American even if we have to pay more.

We know a recession is likely for both countries and we'll be hit harder by it. It's a small price to pay for our sovereignty.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 15 hours ago

Meanwhile, in Canada..

[–] [email protected] 12 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Good to see Carney is holding the line. But will he keep/bulid off of the energy Trudeau used?

[–] [email protected] 69 points 22 hours ago (3 children)

Have they even said thankyou for Trailer Park Boys once?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 hours ago

And can they please dress appropriately?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 hours ago

Thank you! ❤️

[–] P1nkman 7 points 15 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago

Or Avril Lavigne?

[–] [email protected] 20 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

So: at least 4 years, probably longer :/

[–] [email protected] 100 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Good luck -- E. Jean Carroll just kept getting excuses to re-sue him, which was hilarious, since he just could. not. resist. defaming her when legally ordered not to. :). The man seems absolutely compelled to double-down on his disrespect if he is pressured to act like a decent person. He just can't resist trying to "assert dominance" or something.


Carney should formally demand Krasnov "say Thank You" for our water, oil, wood, steel, potash and aluminum, before we drop tariffs. Heh.

EDIT: Vance, too. He should have to say Thank You, on the air, on Fox 'News', before we drop tariffs.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 day ago (2 children)

That’s the point. This will hopefully eventually pressure Congress to do their job.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 hours ago

I fear people think this will be a short term thing but in reality if we want to protect our sovereignty it has to be more permanent. We need to evolve other markets.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

this congress? the majority is drunk on the maga juice, the minority is a disorganized mess still in shock. and combined, the vast majority is bought and paid for by those who stand to gain the most from this shitshow.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 19 hours ago

So Putin is paying.

[–] [email protected] 66 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (2 children)

It seems selling Tariffs to his constituency as something that only affects other countries was his biggest grift after all.

Ah, who am I kidding. It's all grift. A gigantic hairball of grift.

I wish I knew enough about Canadian politics to have a deeper opinion, but afaics: Good

Oh and as a Eu citizen I feel very good about Canada maybe hopefully joining some sort of alliance with us. I didn't have it on my radar before 2025.

[–] CaptainThor 19 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Canada has always seemed more European than not politically, so I hope we join the EU eventually

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

As a Canadian, we've had the attitude for awhile "at least we're not as bad as the USA" but we've definitely drifted from the EU way of doing things. I've always felt like a hybrid between the two (with leanings more to eu).

I wish as Canadians, instead of looking over the fence and patting ourselves on the back for not being the USA, we'd look over the fence and try to see what we can do to improve more (because why reinvent the wheel if you don't have to).

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 hours ago

I was so annoyed in 2012 when we were protesting the tuition fee hike in Québec that people were pointing to other provinces or the US for their higher tuition fees, instead of, like, North European countries, and many others, where it's free.

[–] Vikthor 15 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

You know Canada is a NATO founding member, don't you?

Also we have a free trade agreement with Canada.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

You know Canada is a NATO founding member, don’t you?

You know, you're right. The alliance is already there.

But the USA is also in it... could NATO even defend Europe against Russia, against the US' will?

[–] WildPalmTree 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

They can't even take one country, let alone "Europe". Would it be better with the US in our corner? For sure. But to think the current Russia could take anything except for small parts here and there is laughable. And this only because mother Russia doesn't give a shit about her children.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I think you misunderstand. This:

could NATO even defend Europe against Russia, against the US’ will?

was a question about how NATO internals work, decision making and bureaucracy, not raw firepower.

[–] WildPalmTree 1 points 9 hours ago

As I understand it, each country decided. But I'm not a NATO scholar. I'd be happy for someone more knowledgeable to chime in.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 day ago (2 children)

This is what the Orange Turd deserves. Act like a shit get treated like shit.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 14 hours ago

Such a whiny brat about a needless tarrif war yam tits started himself. This orange turd has no clue how much Canadians hold grudges. This won’t ever be over. Canada is moving on.

[–] j4k3 14 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Tit4Tat will result in the USA always getting hurt worse than everyone else

[–] Atin 5 points 18 hours ago

Good they deserve it and have done since 1791.

[–] generaloutrank 7 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

Tit for tat is also the most effective strategy in game theory though.

Not saying this necessarily applies to this case or in general, but I just found out about this topic and I’m curious to see if and how well/poorly it applies.

https://youtu.be/mScpHTIi-kM

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 hours ago

Kind tit-for-tat is the best strategy.

But that assumes that you have rational actors on both sides of a game!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

I just found out about this topic

The algorithm must be on a tear, I was just suggested that yesterday.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 23 hours ago

Good shit. Go Canada!