this post was submitted on 04 Mar 2025
48 points (77.9% liked)

science

16334 readers
527 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

<--- rules currently under construction, see current pinned post.

2024-11-11

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 53 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I don't see what sex has to do with it. There are many more non-sex cruises doing the same thing.

[–] 7uWqKj 3 points 13 hours ago

Of course. It’s simply clickbait. Worked for you and me, obviously.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 22 hours ago

Imo, the point is just that the juxtaposition of sex cruises to visit the melting antarctic shelves is incongruous

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 day ago

Maybe they’ll provide lube.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sex cruises to where? The complaints of shrinkage will be legendary.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 18 hours ago

Uh, that’s a whoosh, cap’n!

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 day ago

Clever advertisement or what?

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 day ago

I didn’t have that one on my bingo card

[–] Hayduke 10 points 1 day ago

"... full-scale bonkathon"

I approve of this

[–] SculptusPoe 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's a trash article, and Antarctica is the last place anyone should worry about cruises going unless they are chopping up penguins for bird-brunch or something.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The problem is not only the cruise itself, but also all the energy spent getting the people and supplies to run the cruise. Plus the ecosystem is especially fragile, and the Antarctic glaciers are melting too fast as it is, calving icebergs which further damage the environment.

[–] iopq 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

It's no more energy than going on a Pacific cruise

Ships are actually very energy efficient, those people probably would use more gasoline during their daily commute since each of them would drive a car or take a cab. If they went on a plane somewhere for vacation, it would use a lot more fuel

[–] [email protected] 4 points 23 hours ago

They are all taking a plane down to Ushuaia, and from there getting on the cruise ship. So they're doing both.

The big ones are efficient per person, yes, but these ships are smaller.

The worst part of the waste, particulates from combustion, end up on the glacier, darkening it, making it melt even faster.

[–] NOT_RICK 4 points 1 day ago

Don’t cruise ships use bunker fuel?

[–] mojofrododojo 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

so it'll be herpes that kills off the last few penguins? didn't have that on my bingo card...

[–] venusaur 0 points 1 day ago (2 children)

You can die from herpes? Probably more likely to die from beastiality rape.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

As a matter of fact, yes. I was talking to a vet at a friend's wedding, and he casually mentioned that working with simians is a dangerous field for many reasons that you wouldn't think of, like their herpesvirus strains killing us.

[–] venusaur 0 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Luckily it says it’s extremely rare

[–] [email protected] 1 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Well, yeah. The only way to get it is from contact with an infected monkey, or something that has recently contacted them, like a needle.

[–] venusaur 0 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

With no end to deforestation in sight, and fixing the housing crisis, monkeys have been sharing crack houses with humans

[–] mojofrododojo 2 points 1 day ago

Probably more likely to die from beastiality rape.

I was thinking cruise ship waste but uh.... yeah.... that'll probably fuck up a penguin

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

If we're destroying the planet anyway, at least this is a more fun reason to do it.

[–] venusaur 1 points 1 day ago

What’s more natural than sex?