this post was submitted on 03 Mar 2025
65 points (94.5% liked)

Videos

14959 readers
769 users here now

For sharing interesting videos from around the Web!

Rules

  1. Videos only
  2. Follow the global Mastodon.World rules and the Lemmy.World TOS while posting and commenting.
  3. Don't be a jerk
  4. No advertising
  5. No political videos, post those to [email protected] instead.
  6. Avoid clickbait titles. (Tip: Use dearrow)
  7. Link directly to the video source and not for example an embedded video in an article or tracked sharing link.
  8. Duplicate posts may be removed

Note: bans may apply to both [email protected] and [email protected]

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Really appreciate this channel's effort on trying to dispel doomism.

top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] riodoro1 13 points 2 days ago

Doomism sure is bad. It’s even worse than us emitting the most co2 ever last year. Stay positive folks!

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

This is disingenuous. To lower atmospheric co2 we need to actively absorb co2 out from the atmosphere while the output of co2 is lower than the absorption. So to even see a progress on this chart we need to first achieve net zero.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago

I think I need to politely disagree with you on this point.

If co2 emissions were slowing at a meaningful rate, we should be able to see the upward trajectory start leveling off. What we DO see is almost no change in the trajectory of the chart, indicating that current carbon emitters haven't cut back enough to matter, if at all.

I'm not suggesting that no changes on that line means no "progress", but one could argue that its not meaningful progress if we aren't seeing any changes in that trend.

[–] Cort 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

No, we would see an infection point on this chat if we were to make progress, even if we're not at net zero. The chart would at least be increasing at a decreasing rate, as opposed to the current trajectory increasing at a steady or even increasing rate.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Actually, since 2020 the curve looks linear rather than exponential, which does match what he says on the video that we might have stopped increasing emissions year over year. Obviously this is not enough, but it is progress.

[–] Wade 1 points 1 day ago

Probably just due to covid lockdowns. Emissions have been steadily increasing since

https://www.statista.com/statistics/276629/global-co2-emissions/

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago

So we'll have green energy but capitalism will be as strong as ever. A solar dystopia. At least there will be a future for us to be shadowrunners in.

[–] YungOnions 2 points 2 days ago

Just watched this video myself last night. Really good. His other video on positive tipping points is worth a watch to.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Oh great, instead of +4C we're on track for +3.4C

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 days ago

Keep doing sarcasm like that and we will see +3.4°C turn into +3.8°C.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

If we suddenly decide to stop spewing record amounts of greenhouse gases then we might have a small chance... But that needs to be a quick decline which we have simply not seen.