So, submit a completely redacted list of 5 bullet points? Isn't everything the Pentagon does potentially sensitive and related to national security?
politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
Or, if they really want to troll them, just let ChatGPT come up with something.
“What I did last week”
- Looked for work.
- Wrote a “what I did last week” email, and then deleted it when instructed to. Seven times.
- Argued with my manager about whether DOGE was legally allowed to access the information they requested
- got coffee for DOGE employees
- escorted DOGE employees through the building
- spent hours on the phone explaining to constituents that our funding was cut so we couldn’t provide the services they were due
No one is reading the emails. They are all being fed into Grok. There is no way anyone is reading or tracking about 3 million emails. They are all going straight into President musks AI farm. And the right out to whoever paid for access.
Millions upon millions of federal employees sending emails discussing all sorts of highly sensitive and classified information, sent to a DOGE email server run by literal 20 year olds with zero experience, one of which has already been found to leak private business information. What could possibly go wrong?
Who are these emails for? Who's actually going to have access to these emails? Who is reviewing these emails, and who is making the decision of who goes and who doesn't? Where are these emails being stored? How long will you be storing the information? What security measures are in place to protect this high-value target from foreign adversaries? Which departments are going to be prioritized for review? These are all important questions that I'm sure our elected representatives in Congress are going to quickly get to the bottom of, right?
Right?
Guys?
....
...
..
.
^guys?^
And they’re running all these email responses thru their janky-ass AI which I’m sure is as secure as a paper bag under a waterfall.
Watch these assholes get sued by the military courts over trying to declassify information through unofficial channels of communication. New world coming for these fuckers.
That won't do anything. You need officers to openly revolt
Also, it's the one part of the US government that I want to see get fucked by these guys because it's where all the actual waste happens
The actual waste happens by paying third-party military contractors for things the government hasn't been paying attention to since the 70's.
Bingo!
Yes, this will certainly be their undoing.
Classified accountability office is gonna have a heart attack
Accountability in general has 32 stab wounds and 2 broken legs
That presumes they aren't already themselves fired.
How could this not be a massive security breach? Even apart from directly classified work, the synthesis risk of something like this is just mind boggling.