wow, there are some really steaming takes on anarchism in the comments here.
this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2025
687 points (99.3% liked)
Programmer Humor
20829 readers
2420 users here now
Welcome to Programmer Humor!
This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!
For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.
Rules
- Keep content in english
- No advertisements
- Posts must be related to programming or programmer topics
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Real State of Exception Hours
Dunno how accurate this is but if you like doing those quizzes see where you fall on leftist values. https://leftvalues.github.io/index.html
Depends on how pure you want it to be, without any side effects
Nothing wrong with classes in functional programming though. Just return a new instance of the class from your method, rather than mutating an existing instance.
Javascript:
I heard you like mutating class data so I'm mutating the data you can put in your class data, dawg.
JavaScript: a language for mutants.
Classes are just another way to define an object. Heck even Lisp has objects!
Right, I think the two aren't as different as they appear. You can think of a closure as an object with just one method.
If OO programming is fundamentally about objects sending messages to each other, then there are many ways to approach that. Some of those ways are totally compatible with functional programming.
The legacy of C++ has dominated what OOP is "supposed" to be, but it doesn't have to work like that.
view more: next ›