this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2025
60 points (96.9% liked)

News

25236 readers
4887 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
  • Price of Independence: Georgia’s experimental alternative to Medicaid expansion has cost taxpayers more than $86 million.
  • Enrollment Shortfall: Only 6,500 participants have enrolled in the first 18 months of the program — roughly 75% fewer than the state had estimated for year one.
  • Work Slowdown: The state found it difficult to verify that people are working to keep their benefits, so Georgia has gone from monthly checks to annual ones.
top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jpreston2005 11 points 1 day ago

putting work requirements on healthcare is what damned it.

Right now, Georgia is the only state that imposes a work requirement for Medicaid coverage. But more than a dozen largely Republican-led states already plan to seek approval from the Trump administration to impose work requirements on Medicaid enrollees.

Even moving it to an annual work verification isn't going to help. People are struggling to find and maintain work, so why apply for something that's going to be stripped from them in the future, through no fault of their own?

Thousands of others never finished applying, according to the state’s data, as reports of technical glitches mounted. The state also never hired enough people to help residents sign up

the Pathways program has cost federal and state taxpayers more than $86.9 million, three-quarters of which has gone to consultants

The whole thing is a republican boondoggle. They imposed requirements that doomed sign-up, then funneled money to their friends companies, all so they could performatively throw up their hands in despair and say "well, I guess government provided healthcare IS just a waste of tax payer money!" Fucking grifters getting people killed because they'd rather play politics than help people.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 days ago

If the poor are dying and getting no healthcare it is working as intended for the Republicans in that state.

[–] grue 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

They could have just straight-up given the participants $13,369 each and saved money.

“If the goal truly is to increase health insurance for low-income Georgians, they are doing it wrong,” said Dr. Harry J. Heiman, a member of a state commission to study comprehensive health coverage and a professor at Georgia State University School of Public Health. “The one thing that Pathways seems to do well is waste taxpayer money on consultants and administrative costs.”

Damn, in terms of guarded PR-speak, that's about as strong an indictment as there is. Translated to normal plain language, he just accused them of massive purposeful fraud.

[–] Today 5 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Does 75% fewer mean that only one fourth of the estimated number enrolled?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Worse. It took them a year and a half to get as many as they were expecting in a year.

Edit: a year and a half to get a quarter as many as they were expecting in a year.

[–] Alexstarfire 3 points 2 days ago

Who knows. It's a different time period.