this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2025
175 points (99.4% liked)

News

25211 readers
4036 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Lawyers for a group of fired workers argue that the Trump administration’s mass firings of federal employees violate merit-based employment laws.

A complaint filed with the Office of the Special Counsel seeks to halt the terminations and reinstate affected workers.

Federal law requires individual performance-based assessments and 60 days' notice for mass layoffs, which attorneys say were ignored.

Federal workers have strong job protections dating back to an 1883 law aimed at preventing political cronyism.

Legal experts claim Trump’s actions bypass due process and reduction-in-force regulations.

top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It's possible that he can ignore the Office of Special Counsel. I'd guess that its aim is to deal with small-scale stuff like some branch acting improperly, not to overturn executive orders. Don't know, though. Probably have lawyers talking about it somewhere soon, if not already.

But I assume that if they've got a legal basis for a claim, this is just the first step before going to the courts.

investigates

Hmm. Apparently Trump ordered the head of the Office of Special Counsel, the place these guys are appealing to, to himself be fired, one Hampton Dellinger. Dellinger went to the courts and got a court order temporarily reinstating himself as head of the OSC. Apparently the Trump administration then appealed that reinstatement, and the appeals court refused to reverse it, and so the Trump administration is trying to appeal that to SCOTUS in Bessent v. Dellinger.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

As a former manager, this is a hard fucking case to argue. Probationary periods are a way to delay cause requirements for firing. While firing a black worker for being black during a probationary period is absolutely illegal, most other causes are ignored and the documentation is a lot easier.

During the probationary period the employee is waving significant rights so this law team will have a very high burden of proof for their arguments.

[–] Ornadin 4 points 1 day ago

The difference for this is that the probation period is 1 to 2 years for a federal employee.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is just hearsay from another federal employee, but word is they were terminated for performance issues (that almost certainly did not exist). I'm not sure if that makes a difference, but thought I would share it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

It would be helpful evidence certainly. They'll need a lot but every bit helps!