this post was submitted on 14 Feb 2025
76 points (95.2% liked)

Alternative Nation: The Fediverse's Alternative and Indie Music Community

3637 readers
15 users here now

Alternative Nation : The Fediverse's largest alternative and indie music community! All things alternative music, from 80s college rock to today's indie and all the amazing alternative music in between. Welcome home, music nerds!

Some of y'all may remember MTV's Alternative Nation or 120 Minutes, awesome programs & incredible ways to discover #music back in the 80s & 90s...

Welcome, to the Fediverse edition!

🎡🎧🎢

Subscribe, share, & chat!

Share youtube, songwhip, spotify, bandcamp links, music memes, album art, articles, whatever! But avoid links to directly download music (don't want to get Lemmy.world in trouble). Songwhip links always appreciated!

See this post on recs on how to post!

The Golden Rule: Music taste is subjective so don't be a gatekeeping asshole. There's no "bad music", only music you like or don't like.

We Are A Community: So no racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, ableism, or spam.

🎡 Let's get lost in the Fediverse's record store together! 🎢

Other Lemmy music communities to explore and support:

Where to find ren:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://sh.itjust.works/post/32737341

my version is better

top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] khannie 7 points 5 days ago (2 children)

My favourite personal instance of this:

I went to the danger zone.

Definitely better than "Highway to" IMO. Only made this discovery about a year ago and was incredulous, then shocked after a quick search. I'm never changing the way I sing it.

[–] FireRetardant 17 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Highway implys a high speed trip to the danger zone whereas i went to the daner zone could be a much more leisurely pace. Most of the song is in the present tense of going to the danger zone whereas i went to the danger zone is past tense. The rest of the song is also riddled with engine, speed, and other driving influences which helps ground the highway lyrics into the theme of the rest of the song.

[–] SirSamuel 7 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Booo! I bet you think "Rev up like a deuce" is better than "Roll up like a douche" as well, you insufferable pedant ^/s

[–] TrickDacy 3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

I remember discovering that song late at night long ago and laughing out loud, incredulous the lyrics could be that. I listened carefully and heard "rolled up like a douche" each time. I had to find the lyrics specifically to refute it!

[–] khannie 4 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Well, this comment caused me to look up the lyrics again and realise I have another banger because I was sure it was "I took it right intoooo the danger zooooooone" and I was like...."wait, that's past tense".

Anyway, it turns out its "I'll take you right into the danger zone". Again, I'm definitely keeping my messed up version.

I wonder how my ears have been hearing both of those two things wrong from that one song for so many years. Probably because I was singing along. It's a must sing along tune.

edit: Actually my first intro to the song was probably Top Gun on VHS so I was thinking flying instead of driving and the sound quality was probably rubbish.

edit edit: I'm going to have to listen to it now. "it" and "you" are just so far apart I may be gaslighting myself here.

[–] FireRetardant 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

We've all been guilty of it. I only really knew the differences because of how many times I've watched Archer where they use the lyrics and song sometimes.

[–] khannie 2 points 5 days ago

Oh God. It just got worse - I've watched at least 4 seasons of Archer. HAHAHA.

[–] JoeTheSane 4 points 5 days ago

That’s pretty good! I may use that from here on out.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

The inverse of this is St Elmo's Fire. My wife and I joked that the line was "I can be your man in motion, all I need is a pair of wheels." thinking it was hilarious and a great replacement.

Well, a few years ago we looked the actual lyrics up and... that's the actual line.

Turns out the song was written for a Canadian paralympian. "David Foster and John Parr wrote this song specifically for the movie St. Elmo's Fire, but the song itself is about a Canadian athlete named Rick Hansen, who was paralyzed from the waist down after a car crash when he was 15.".

Honestly, it made the song that much better.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago

I have a good friend who misheard "lose yourself to dance" in the song of the same name. Instead, he heard " lose your self respect". We love it though and that's the version we still sing nearly a decade later.

[–] JoeTheSane 2 points 5 days ago

You know... I posted this and am having a Music Store brainfart on ones that I got wrong. Stupid brain.