this post was submitted on 12 Feb 2025
143 points (98.0% liked)

politics

20298 readers
6183 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Trump and his allies are signaling they may defy court rulings after a federal judge blocked Elon Musk’s DOGE from accessing Treasury payment systems.

JD Vance and Trump dismissed judicial authority, raising concerns of a constitutional crisis. Experts warn ignoring court orders would break legal precedent and undermine checks and balances.

Judges have repeatedly restrained Trump’s sweeping government cuts, but the administration continues pushing its agenda.

Critics say Musk’s influence represents an “attempted coup,” while Trump’s legal strategy may ultimately be tested at the Supreme Court.

top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] snekerpimp 64 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There is no “may”. They are signaling they will defy judges orders. They are in their “lies and misinformation” phase, where they convince dumb and racist Americans that it’s perfectly normal in our democracy for the president to be a self serving dictator.

I just wish more people had seen schoolhouse rock.

[–] MacAttak8 30 points 1 week ago

They ARE ALREADY defying court orders. The papers continue to refuse to call a spade a spade.

https://lemmy.world/post/25446156

[–] MilitantAtheist 23 points 1 week ago
[–] SkybreakerEngineer 22 points 1 week ago

Weren't some of those deadlines last night? They're not signaling, they're already ignoring court orders

[–] cmoney 21 points 1 week ago

Who could have seen this coming? A convicted felon who has avoided any real consequences and spent his entire adult life fucking people over is gonna ignore the courts? Can't wait for the wagging of the finger or shaking of the fist he's got coming to him.

[–] errer 14 points 1 week ago

All the federal websites they took down were supposed to be back up today. They are not back up today. That’s a direct violation of a court order.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

What happens when the judge sends a marshal? Popcorn eating begins...

[–] Nightwingdragon 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

What happens when the judge sends a marshal?

Nothing. Nothing will happen. Judges will send out an endless series of court orders essentially saying "Pretty Please", but in the end, they will be able to do nothing beyond using a stern "disappointed parent" tone, asking politely, and just hoping Trump decides to comply. Because that's all the power they have. And that's not sarcasm. The Judicial branch has no power of enforcement.

From there, 99% of judges won't do anything knowing that any attempt to take enforcement action on the President will immediately be struck down by the courts as the Supreme Court has already ruled that Trump is immune from prosecution, rendering any attempt at judicial enforcement an exercise in futility.

But let's say a judge is willing to try. First, he'd have to find marshals actually willing to cooperate and face retaliation from Trump, his base, etc.. Then what are the marshals expected to actually do? Walk up to the White House, knock on the door, and put Trump in handcuffs? They'd be lucky if they were able to set foot on the grounds before being told to fuck all the way off by the Secret Service. And that's the GOOD outcome.

And then the retaliation tour begins. Admittedly, he probably wouldn't have them arrested as that would be a little too on the nose, even for Trump. But they would start a smear campaign. There would be demands for the judge's removal from the bench, and those marshals would probably be spending the rest of their lives in fear of retaliation from Trump's mob. Think of what happened to the Georgia poll workers. That, only amplified about 50 times over. Again, this is the GOOD outcome for them.

Trump would then go on with business as usual as Fox News and Twitter write the whole thing off as an activist judge trying to make a name for himself at Trump's expense as he says he should have just had the judge arrested for treason for openly defying Supreme Court orders declaring him immune, the irony and hypocrisy of his own statement notwithstanding.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Marshals fall under the Executive. Judicial branch doesn't have any law enforcement.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Judges can and will send marshals to enforce court orders. If you or I are held in contempt and ignore a court order, we can absolutely expect a marshal to knock on our door and arrest us. I'm a lawyer admitted to four different Federal Courts.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

So what happens when Trump pardons anyone arrested, or says it's all official acts?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

In a normal functioning US, sure. But it doesn't change the fact that the US Marshals report to the Dept of Justice, who reports to the Executive. Judicial branch doesn't own their own law enforcement, and since norms and actual laws don't matter in this timeline, I doubt the Executive is going to allow their own law enforcement to come after themselves.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

They are ignoring court orders. See also https://beehaw.org/post/18430614

[–] Nightwingdragon 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Our justice system is not a co-equal branch of government. It is merely an advisory panel with no enforcement power. With no enforcement power and nobody willing to enforce them, their rulings are mere suggestions that don't actually have to be followed.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)
  1. ~~Soap~~
  2. ~~Ballot~~
  3. Jury
  4. ????
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

…Vance said that the courts would inevitably “stop” Trump from trying to fire so many employees. When they do, Vance went on, Trump should “stand before the country like Andrew Jackson did, and say, ‘The chief justice has made his ruling. Now let him enforce it.’”

Vox in July 2024

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Guy behind him in the vid looks like they are tripping balls.