Flippant Anarchism. A lighter take on social criticism with the aim of agitation.
Post humorous takes on capitalism and the states which prop it up. Memes, shitposting, screenshots of humorous good takes, discussions making fun of some reactionary online, it all works.
This community is anarchist-flavored. Reactionary takes won't be tolerated.
Don't take yourselves too seriously. Serious posts go to [email protected]
Rules
If you post images with text, endeavour to provide the alt-text
If the image is a crosspost from an OP, Provide the source.
Absolutely no right-wing jokes. This includes "Anarcho"-Capitalist concepts.
Absolutely no redfash jokes. This includes anything that props up the capitalist ruling classes pretending to be communists.
No bigotry whatsoever. See instance rules.
This is an anarchist comm. You don't have to be an anarchist to post, but you should at least understand what anarchism actually is. We're not here to educate you.
Join the matrix room for some real-time discussion.
why are people still gobsmacked that laws don't apply to the owner class, only the peasant class
it's been this way for thousands of years
everyone in this particular com knows the solution so i don't have to break the rules and spell it out, but it's the only solution
No one is gobsmacked. the point is to continuously point it out.
Not gobsmacked, just pointing out the gate.
Just so you know, you don't have to be surprised by an event to post about it. But not posting about it doesn't keep it in peoples' mind, so that's why these get posted. Plus, there's always going to be a couple of the lucky 10k that see this for the first time and finally wake up to that fact.
point taken
Because we want to kill them and they don't want to die.
Everything processed by AI should be considered Public Domain. If they get it for free so do I.
This changed a lot of people's perception of MIT, and not for the better.
Did that have any noticeable effect on the policies or behavior of MIT?
MIT didn't seem to think it did anything wrong and considered the school to be a neutral participant. I've seen nothing since that would indicate they accept any blame.
I had a bad feeling when tech was turning out more like Zuckerberg and less like the Swartz. I didn't think they'd go full dystopia.
Aaron should have thought to start a trillion dollar multinational first -- then those laws that persecuted him would have just been a formality he could buy his way out of.
The article seems to focus on the seeding part, i.e. distribution, but not the downloading part. Isn't downloading part illegal too? Or did they buy all those books?
Historically, the legal system is much more concerned with the distribution, not the downloading.