At this point I think it’s good OPSEC to err on the side of caution and assume anything involving Musk is a security threat.
this post was submitted on 08 Feb 2025
71 points (85.9% liked)
Technology
62827 readers
5435 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
He will sell out any country to the highest bidder.
Why single out Musk? Assume any ISP is spying on you and you'll be better off. Use a VPN. He could still track where you are, but not what you're doing.
Why single out Musk?
Because the post is specifically about Starlink and most people are capable of understanding that limiting discussion to what's relevant is not the same as “singling out” Musk.
Anything that cunt touches is a security risk.
Any critical infrastructure operated abroad is a security issue. That's why even Europe developed its own alternative to GPS, to not be entirely dependant of the US?
I'm no expert, but I hardly see it being more complicated?