this post was submitted on 07 Feb 2025
10 points (85.7% liked)

politics

19882 readers
4276 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The overprescription of medications, particularly opioids and other high-risk drugs, has sparked a heated debate about accountability. Should doctors be held legally responsible for prescribing too many medications, or is the issue rooted in systemic failures, such as pressure from pharmaceutical companies and patient demands? Where should the line be drawn between necessary treatment and medical negligence? And what role should policy reforms play in addressing this issue?

https://ace-usa.org/blog/research/research-publichealth/understanding-the-accountability-for-overprescription-debate/

top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Yes. Also, societal, for driving so many people to such extreme coping mechanisms

[–] foggy 1 points 1 day ago

Overprescribing as a doctor issue. Diseases like MRSA staph infection are systemic issue.

These are two sides of the same color.

Another important variable is the placebo effect, and public pressure

[–] PP_BOY_ 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

a doctor problem or a systemic issue

Two phrases for the same thing.

The handful of well-intentioned docs are the exception, not the rule.

The Opioid Crisis might've started from Purdue Pharmaceuticals, but it was carried out by rank-and-file doctors who gladly attended those "all expenses paid" seminars (in Hawaii) and ignored/gaslit victims for years once reports of how destructive the prescription were.

In my eyes, members of the Medical Cartel of America have two primary goals: wealth and prestige. The whole "helping people" thing is just a pill they have to swallow (heh) to achieve them.

[–] chonglibloodsport 1 points 21 hours ago

The handful of well-intentioned docs are the exception, not the rule.

I wouldn’t be so quick to judge the intentions of doctors who do over-prescribe. Consider this scenario:

You are a doctor. Your patient comes in with severe pain from a herniated disc caused by an injury at work. None of the ordinary painkillers or muscle relaxants you prescribe are working and they keep returning to your office to complain about constant pain. You know that opioids will be extremely effective at reducing or eliminating their pain but you also know that these drugs cause addiction. You explain this to your patient and they are adamant: they are 100% willing to risk becoming a drug addict if it means they can escape their severe chronic pain.

What do you do?

Personally, I find this dilemma so troubling that I would not want to be a doctor because of it. I have other reasons for not taking that career path but even if it were the only reason it would be enough to stop me. I don’t think it’s at all obvious that you can just ignore a patient in severe pain and say “I’m sorry, I won’t prescribe this legal drug which will alleviate your pain.”

[–] Nightwingdragon 1 points 1 day ago

Both. Some doctors are directly in the pockets of big pharma and the insurance industry and just over-prescribe whatever they're told to. Others over-prescribe from pressure from their patients either for a quick fix of whatever painkillers they're hooked on or are just insistent on getting prescribed whatever meds they see advertised on TV, and a fear of losing their patients to another doctor who will gladly blindly prescribe whatever they ask anyway.

Some just don't know any better and just push whatever they can to get the patient out of the office as quickly as possible so they can move onto the next one, and some patients refuse to take their meds properly, leading them to just get sick again and need even more.

Irresponsibility all around, basically. There's no innocents here.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

It's because all the money is being spent on treatments instead of cures! Big Pharma is big for a reason.

If doctors had a way to cure people's pain/conditions they would!