this post was submitted on 31 Jan 2025
43 points (97.8% liked)

Technology

61413 readers
6315 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 18 points 4 days ago

I can't help but read "aggressive mining disguised as geothermal tech".

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Fine, I'll take my attention elsewhere if you insist...

[–] TheGrandNagus 2 points 3 days ago

Weird, I read fine with Ublock+Firefox

[–] TheGrandNagus 9 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

TL;DR:

Geothermal energy is currently only feasible in very few places where heat comes close to the surface. We are limited by how far we can dig.

The article doesn't really go into detail on why that is, but basically it's due to pressure and heat, drill bits last less time the deeper we go, eventually there's just way too much pressure. It effectively becomes impossible to dig past a certain point due to the cost and materials science of drill bits.

But lasers don't have this problem, enabling us to dig much much deeper, potentially making geothermal practical in many more locations.

[–] Khuda 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

geothermal

renewable

WTF are they smoking?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I guess it’s not technically renewable but the reservoir of geothermal energy is so vast it’s hard to see how it could be used up and it has minimal environmental impacts.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Don't current geothermal techniques trigger small earthquakes in the midwest and Ohio Valley?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

It is possible depending on the technology used. I personally don’t think the earthquake issue is as big of a deal as people think it is. We’re talking quakes so small you don’t even feel them.

I don’t know if this would compound and lead to larger ones if there were more facilities. If so it could be a bigger concern.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

To be fair, I don't even consider solar and wind power to be renewable. But then again I'm the sort of weirdo that considers things on astronomical timescales.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Renewable doesn't exist on astronomical time scales, so you're just being an ass.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

"Renewable" is just a word they came up with to keep us from doing something about the fact that the sun will grow into a red giant with a diameter larger than Earth's orbit.

[–] A_A 1 points 3 days ago

(...) This study challenges the belief that the brittle-ductile transition (BDT) marks a cutoff for fluid circulation in the crust, demonstrating that permeability can develop in deforming semi-ductile rocks.

white paper in NaturePermeability partitioning through the brittle-to-ductile transition and its implications for supercritical geothermal reservoirs
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-024-52092-0