Welcome to Programmer Humor!
This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!
For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.
Same could be said about other distros, btw ;)
I know we should not objectify people, and I rarely do.
That said.. As a heterosexual man I got to say that this is one of the first times I have truly seen how handsome Elvis was. God damn.
IMHO Debian and Ubuntu should be swapped: swapped:
Debian as the serious guy, that's doing the hard work under the hood while the flashy Ubuntu gets the credit for being popular.
But Debian doesn't sell enterprise support while trying to screw its users
10+ year Ubuntu user here, how have I been screwed again?
Let's ignore all the anti-consumer bs (like selling user data to Amazon) and just focus on snaps.
apt get install firefox for example)each snap installed slows down your boot time
How so? How much impact are we talking? First I've heard of this
It needs to mount virtual directories for each snap. If I remember correctly it does a part of the job on boot and part on login.
Not really noticed it tbh:
1.951s snapd.seeded.service
1.673s snapd.service
Seems to be a lot longer than the mounts themselves but even then pretty minimal impact:
$ systemd-analyze blame | grep snap | grep mount
86ms snap-bare-5.mount
85ms snap-blanket-49.mount
84ms snap-btop-813.mount
83ms snap-btop-814.mount
82ms snap-chromium-3010.mount
82ms snap-chromium-3025.mount
80ms snap-core18-2829.mount
79ms snap-core18-2846.mount
78ms snap-core20-2379.mount
77ms snap-core20-2434.mount
76ms snap-core22-1663.mount
76ms snap-core22-1722.mount
75ms snap-core24-609.mount
74ms snap-core24-716.mount
73ms snap-cups-1067.mount
72ms snap-firefox-5600.mount
71ms snap-firefox-5647.mount
70ms snap-firmware\x2dupdater-127.mount
69ms snap-firmware\x2dupdater-147.mount
68ms snap-gnome\x2d3\x2d28\x2d1804-198.mount
67ms snap-gnome\x2d3\x2d38\x2d2004-140.mount
66ms snap-gnome\x2d3\x2d38\x2d2004-143.mount
65ms snap-gnome\x2d42\x2d2204-172.mount
64ms snap-gnome\x2d42\x2d2204-176.mount
63ms snap-gnome\x2d46\x2d2404-66.mount
62ms snap-gnome\x2d46\x2d2404-77.mount
61ms snap-gtk\x2dcommon\x2dthemes-1534.mount
60ms snap-gtk\x2dcommon\x2dthemes-1535.mount
59ms snap-libreoffice-330.mount
58ms snap-libreoffice-334.mount
57ms snap-mesa\x2d2404-143.mount
56ms snap-mesa\x2d2404-44.mount
55ms snap-nvtop-171.mount
54ms snap-pinta-33.mount
53ms snap-pinta-37.mount
52ms snap-snap\x2dstore-1244.mount
51ms snap-snap\x2dstore-1248.mount
50ms snap-snapd-23258.mount
49ms snap-snapd-23545.mount
48ms snap-snapd\x2ddesktop\x2dintegration-247.mount
47ms snap-snapd\x2ddesktop\x2dintegration-253.mount
46ms snap-surfshark-51.mount
44ms snap-telegram\x2ddesktop-6489.mount
43ms snap-transmission-100.mount
42ms snap-youtube\x2ddl-4630.mount
41ms snap-youtube\x2ddl-4806.mount
40ms var-snap-firefox-common-host\x2dhunspell.mount
24ms snap-telegram\x2ddesktop-6495.mount
Also remember that systemd isn't generally doing this in series, waiting for each unit before starting the next. It's firing off a bunch of units and then continuing what it does. If it were measuring the actual time that a unit takes without including the fact that it's waiting for resources that other units are using, it's highly unlikely that bare, which is basically empty, would take longer than massive snaps like Firefox and the GNOME content snaps.
Theoretically with a huge number of snaps and slow enough storage media this could have a noticeable effect, but in practice that case is highly unlikely.
What's the total without the second grep?
Using mistral to calculate this but looks close enough
1921 + 1673 + 242 + 85 + 84 + 84 + 83 + 82 + 81 + 80 + 79 + 77 + 77 + 75 + 74 + 73 + 72 + 71 + 70 + 69 + 68 + 68 + 67 + 66 + 65 + 64 + 63 + 62 + 61 + 60 + 59 + 58 + 57 + 56 + 55 + 54 + 53 + 52 + 52 + 51 + 50 + 48 + 48 + 47 + 46 + 45 + 44 + 43 + 41 + 21 + 18 = 7264ms
So, the total sum of all the time values is 7264 milliseconds, or 7.264 seconds
Removing the snapd services: 7264ms - 3836ms = 3428ms
Let's not forget the sending unity search results to Amazon fiasco
Ubuntu is the Microsoft of Linux.
trying to
I use arch, btw.
Arch is filming
you forgot: the lfs masochist
Shaddy
Native English speaker here, what does “shaddy” mean?
It's not an English word. Its use here is most likely a misspelling of "shady", which means disreputable, questionable, or possibly up to no good.
Hiding something
shady?
"Your acting hella shaddy"
Seriously? If you see that you should realise it's not a good source of information.
You're dumb as fuck.
This is one of my favorite photos on the Internet
Why is Colbert doing security for Elvis?
Was Elivis considered particularly versatile?
He knew karate and was an actor, I guess
I seem to remember he also did some singing.
No way. The guy who died on the toilet?
Singing while 🎶 searching for yooouuuuuuu, in the cold Kentucky raaaaaaiiiiaaaaaaaiiiiaaaahhhaaaahhaaaaahhaaaaiiiiinnnn.🎶
I was unaware that Debian had a thing for 14 year olds.
Trixie is 13
So much misinformation on the internet smh