this post was submitted on 23 Jan 2025
993 points (99.3% liked)

Flippanarchy

467 readers
490 users here now

Flippant Anarchism. A lighter take on social criticism with the aim of agitation.

Post humorous takes on capitalism and the states which prop it up. Memes, shitposting, screenshots of humorous good takes, discussions making fun of some reactionary online, it all works.

This community is anarchist-flavored. Reactionary takes won't be tolerated.

Don't take yourselves too seriously. Serious posts go to [email protected]

Rules


  1. If you post images with text, endeavour to provide the alt-text

  2. If the image is a crosspost from an OP, Provide the source.

  3. Absolutely no right-wing jokes. This includes "Anarcho"-Capitalist concepts.

  4. Absolutely no redfash jokes. This includes anything that props up the capitalist ruling classes pretending to be communists.

  5. No bigotry whatsoever. See instance rules.

  6. This is an anarchist comm. You don't have to be an anarchist to post, but you should at least understand what anarchism actually is. We're not here to educate you.

founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 84 points 3 days ago (1 children)

There is a moral imperative to disregard the law when the law does not deliver justice.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

"But without ~~religion~~ laws how will I know what's right or wrong?" Anarchists are just atheists who go one god further.

[–] iAvicenna 12 points 3 days ago (1 children)

well because law generally serves the powerful

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

well because law ~~generally~~ only serves the powerful

[–] Delphia 4 points 2 days ago

"Never forget in the story of Jesus, the hero was killed by the state" - Killer Mike

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 days ago

We can plot it on 2 axis as a 2x2 grid:

legal & legitimate   |  illegal & legitimate
----------------------------------------------
legal & illegitimate |  illegal & illegitimate

Definitions:

  • legal: conforms to the law
  • illegal: breaks the law
  • legitimate: the right thing to do
  • illegitimate: the wrong thing to do (not sure if this translation is correct, but this is what I mean)

Examples:

  • legal & legitimate: Doing things which are allowed and fine, both morally and legally. Like crafting things and selling for a fair price.
  • illegal & legitimate: Might be as small as crossing the street when the lights are red (although no one is nearby), or as big as rebelling against systemic injustice // 2nd row of OP picture
  • legal & illegitimate: Exploiting others, benefitting from negative externalities, though under legal protection. Like the 1st row of OP picture, and things like fossil fuel extraction, colonialism, imperialism
  • illegal & illegitimate: Villainous deeds like murder

I learned this idea during a training workshop for social disobedience (climate action, sit-in). Of course we saw ourselves on the legitimate side, partially covered by law, partially breaking it, but ultimately not caring so much about that part due to the perceived legitimateness. Against the fossil fuel industry, which we see as illegitimate, though sadly protected by law.

PS: Not sure if intended, but this sub's image very much reminds me of the movie SMILE, which might be my all time horror favorite.

[–] secretlyaddictedtolinux 10 points 3 days ago

this is a wonderful reminder of the truth

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Ethics: refer to a set of principles and guidelines that are established by a community, organization, or society to promote responsible and respectful behavior.

Law reflects the ethics of the populace, not the other way around.

"Ethical" is a social construct that's time-bound based upon the beliefs and actions of the people.

Slavery was ethical, for the population of slavers. The holocaust was ethical, based upon the beliefs of Nazis.

"Ethics" isn't a guideline, it's a benchmark.

History is written by the winners and we are all a product of our environment, including our time. If we were born 200 years ago in the US South, we'd be perfectly fine with slavery.

That doesn't make it right, we have a different perspective here in the present, where we understand (or at least understood) basic human rights, and that black people are, indeed, human.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Well, you and the meme creator need to look up how the definitions of "ethics" and "morality" differ. Although the definition of "ethics" that you quoted is already a good start.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Can we please write comments that add something to the discussion?

Morality is that group of norms defined by a group or society at a given moment. Ethics is the study of morality.

The OP didn't mix up the terms; it was your parent comment. It costs us nothing to not just criticize

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

If we were born 200 years ago in the US South, we’d be perfectly fine with slavery.

This is blatantly false. Lincoln didn't wake up one day and suddenly think "hey maybe slavery is bad". Abolitionists had been fighting for centuries.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Abolitionists were a growing minority. Lincoln didn't just wake up one day and free the slaves...but we are still 18 years away from the 200 year anniversary of the emancipation proclamation.

But society (US society) as a whole accepted slavery as a fact of life.

Just like we accept suicide nets, sweat factories, "inmate labor", ,Uighur camps, and North Korean "mercenaries" as facts of life today. We don't want them, we just choose to forget they exist. Through our collective inaction, we passively condone them.

Plenty of individuals oppose them enough to actively avoid supporting them in any way, but they are such an inconsiderable minority of consumers, in the eyes of the corporate lords.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago (3 children)

I just finished a book this afternoon and this was a huge theme of it. Wonderful book, but hard to recommend. "Wind and truth" by Brandon Sanderson. I love his stuff, but you would need to read around 20 gigantic books to get to this point. Still, worth the effort if you like fantasy.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

I just finished the first book of the Mistborn series. I can't wait to read Wind and Truth in 15 years!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

😄I think you just solved what I should gift my girlfriend for birthday 🤭

[–] SkybreakerEngineer 1 points 3 days ago

Yes, please don't recommend people jump straight into the 5th book in an entire series of bricks.

Also, anyone talking to that character immediately becomes Super Kami Guru in my head. NAAAALE!

[–] assa123 1 points 2 days ago
[–] MITM0 1 points 2 days ago

Funny thing about morality is that morality is fickle & chaotic Law brings order & acts as a check to it, because it's calculated

To the slavers, it was moral to enslave

[–] WrenFeathers 2 points 3 days ago

Poweful message, this.

load more comments
view more: next ›