this post was submitted on 16 Jan 2025
187 points (95.6% liked)

politics

19346 readers
1955 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

US Secretary of State Antony Blinken’s final press conference was interrupted on Thursday by two journalists who blasted him over the US’s support for Israel's war on Gaza before they were forcibly removed from the State Department's press briefing room.

The journalists repeatedly interrupted Blinken within the first 15 minutes of his hour-long press conference. The outgoing Secretary of State asked both men to hold their questions until later, but they persisted until security guards came to take them away.

“Why did you keep the bombs flowing?” Max Blumenthal, editor of the Grayzone, an online news site, shouted at Blinken from the back of the press room. “Why did you sacrifice the rules-based order on the mantle of your commitment to Zionism?”

Asked by one reporter if he had any regrets about not enforcing red lines on Israel, Blinken said the Biden administration’s policies “were basically supported by an overwhelming majority of Israelis after the trauma of October 7”.

top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FuglyDuck 12 points 14 hours ago

so, to the "overwhelming majority of Israelis" comment: This is the full comment

if I may engage in a bit of sane washing for just a second.... I think what he's trying to say is that our approach was tempered by the extreme emotions being felt by israelis basically as a whole. And Yes, I sort of get what he's saying. ultimately its the same argument zionists use to justify aid to Israel for... well... longer than I've been alive. basically, that our aid gives us a leash to help restrain Israel from doing... a genocide.

it's actually even more infuriating than the idea that he's drafting american policy according to the polling of foreign nationals, personally.

I remember 9/11 and where I was (highschool. i was in the school's graphics lab. The teacher just went and turned on the TV news and we spent the entire class in stunned silence. I still remember the musty smell of commercial carpet and school-basement.)

I remember very well the anger and rage I felt. People needed to pay. it didn't help that certain people took advantage of that attack specifically to satisfy their own agenda and greed, inflaming emotions. anyone who is right-thinking should have a sense of shame about what we- as americans- did to Iraq and Afghanistan. This is not to say we should have done nothing, but rather that what we did do was shameful, and we could, and should, have done better.

So yes, I do have some sympathy, some understanding, of what Israelis are feeling.

But that hurt and fear does not, could not, and must never justify genocide.

Blinken is patting himself on the back for getting an asshole to stop throwing bricks, conveniently ignoring that he was the one handing the asshole bricks in the first place, and that the asshole only stopped after it completely knocked out every window and most the doors in this proverb.

One does not give a child who is lashing out in rage a knife.

One does not give a bully, who just found out what happens when you push to hard, too far, and get punched in the face, a fucking gun.

It is immoral, unethical, and blatantly illegal to give a genocidal regime the tools they want, to continue prosecuting genocide.

It is not necessary to accommodate their demands for more weapons, to respect, and to have sympathy for the loss and hurt and fear. Accommodating those demands in abeyance of US law; and frankly, just plain common sense,

[–] [email protected] 90 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (2 children)

Biden administration’s policies “were basically supported by an overwhelming majority of Israelis after the trauma of October 7”.

Too bad Biden wasn't running for president of Israel but here in America, now he has to hand over the reigns to a fascist.

[–] SGGeorwell 15 points 15 hours ago

The multi-dimensional levels of irony are staggering.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

lol, the fascist will support israel even harder.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

What's harder than genocide, dummy? Nuclear strikes?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

lol, you think it can't get worse? oh my sweet summer child

[–] [email protected] 1 points 23 minutes ago

Answer the question, deedee.

[–] Ensign_Crab 3 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

At least no one had the opportunity to vote for someone who was anti-genocide.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 hours ago

Well they did, but not unscathed by those who weren't.

[–] Ensign_Crab 20 points 17 hours ago

Asked by one reporter if he had any regrets about not enforcing red lines on Israel, Blinken said the Biden administration’s policies “were basically supported by an overwhelming majority of Israelis after the trauma of October 7”.

And this is the US, which is run by Some Other Country's Majority Rule.

[–] [email protected] 47 points 20 hours ago (4 children)

Blinken said the Biden administration’s policies “were basically supported by an overwhelming majority of Israelis after the trauma of October 7”.

Okay what? Did Biden's senility infect Blinken too? He knows he's the secretary of state of America right?

[–] Ensign_Crab 4 points 9 hours ago

He knows he’s the secretary of state of America right?

He knows what country he represents. It's not the US.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 18 hours ago

Yeah that's not at all a valid reason for enabling genocide. Won't stop him continuing to use that as his only excuse :(

[–] MolecularCactus1324 7 points 17 hours ago

Is Blinken the Secretary of State of Israel or the United States?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 17 hours ago

State Department briefings in the last 16 months has been a constant demonstration they felt serving Israeli interests came first.

[–] Grimy 11 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Blinken said the Biden administration’s policies “were basically supported by an overwhelming majority of Israelis after the trauma of October 7”.

Justified Genocide.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 17 hours ago

"We never asked the Palestinians."

[–] Doorbook 12 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (2 children)

What this journalist also wanted to ask about is Blinken relations with his step father and their relations to Maxwell's family.

I went to read a bit and found out Blinken's step father name is Samuel Pisar and he was the "confidant" and maybe the last person to speak to Robert Maxwell. You know the mosad agent who is also happen to be the father of Ghislaine Maxwell !

This is only the tip of the iceberg....

[–] TokenBoomer 9 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

Did you read that his great-uncle Maurice was an early backer of Israel?

His son, Maurice Blinken, was an early backer of Israel and founded the American Palestine Institute which helped persuade the United States to back the creation of Israel.

[–] Jagger2097 7 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

What the heck are you implying?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago

That the mossad is running a sexual blackmail operation? Isn't it clear to everybody at this point?

[–] [email protected] 25 points 21 hours ago

He’s a shitbag cunt.

[–] kreskin 4 points 17 hours ago

The dems will bring him back in some form too. I'd bet money on it. He and Shapiro are their prized cash cows. I bet they run one of them for president in this next cycle or two, assuming we ever get to vote again afetr they ran us all straight off the road this time.