this post was submitted on 15 Jan 2025
168 points (93.8% liked)

News

23869 readers
5493 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 days ago (1 children)

What does this even really accomplish? Obama famously pushed for greater relations with Cuba, and Trump reversed all of that progress. Trump is very likely to reverse this as well.

If it was actually something important, and it was something Biden could do kinda whenever, what is the point of doing it now? If Biden had at least done it when he took office, we could have had a few years fostering relations again. Now, we'll be lucky to have a month.

[–] partial_accumen 5 points 2 days ago (2 children)

As much as I celebrate the removal of Cuba from this terror list, and the possible positive implications it will have for the people of Cuba, I am very well aware that that isn't what any of these actions are about by either Biden, or what trump will do afterward.

Trump is very likely to reverse this as well.

And Trump will spend political capital to do it alienating groups that supported the removal of Cuba from the list.

If it was actually something important, and it was something Biden could do kinda whenever, what is the point of doing it now?

Because it forces trump to put it back on, and if trump does it immediately, the two events (Biden removing, Trump adding) will be highlighted in the minds of the electorate (who care about this subject).

If Biden had at least done it when he took office, we could have had a few years fostering relations again.

And Biden would have had to spend political capital to do it, alienating those that support restrictions on Cuba like the large voting block in Florida.

Now, we’ll be lucky to have a month.

Which is also part of the point of the timing I think. The GOP and trump will be forced to carry the title of putting the restriction on Cuba again.

This is all just political gamesmanship, not active policy agenda items. I still support the removal either way (and for any amount of time).

[–] njm1314 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I mean I'll bet a billion dollars that those groups are alienated by Trump just by being Trump and that therefore had no political capital is going to be wasted here.

[–] partial_accumen 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I mean I’ll bet a billion dollars that those groups are alienated by Trump just by being Trump and that therefore had no political capital is going to be wasted here.

"On the issue of the U.S. embargo against Cuba, 55% of Cuban Americans in South Florida support its continuation, although they also show relatively high support for some engagement policies such as the selling of food (61% support) and medicine (69% support) to the island. Support for the continuation of the embargo drops to 43% among Cuban Americans not born on the island." source

So if trump re-enables full bans he risks pissing off from 45% to 69% of Cuban Americans likely voters. See? This is politics. Biden gets to make one policy change with zero consequences to himself a few days before he leaves office that will torpedo trump support in a key group if trump puts it back to the way it was just a couple of weeks prior.

[–] njm1314 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Wanting food and Medicine sent to the citizens of a state you consider controlled by a totalitarian government isn't the same thing as wanting said totalitarian government removed from the list of Terror sponsors. So you're making it quite a logical leap there.

I'd also point out that Trump's approval numbers and voting numbers from the Cuban community is extremely high. Something like 68% last I checked. This is after he reversed Cuban decisions during his last Administration.

[–] partial_accumen 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So you’re making it quite a logical leap there.

Read my post again, please. I said: "from 45% to 69%". I accounted for the 69% at the maximum, while recognizing the lower percentage.

[–] njm1314 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

My issue wasn't the numbers, it was the concept.

[–] partial_accumen 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

My issue wasn’t the numbers, it was the concept.

The numbers are the placeholders in my statement for the concepts. Each of the concepts you're calling out has a number attached to it in my citation. If you refuse to acknowledge the numbers, simply use them as placeholders for the concepts as they are 1:1.

[–] njm1314 1 points 1 day ago

I'm not refusing to acknowledge the numbers I just think the numbers relate to something that has nothing to do with the topic. Hence why I think you're making a logical leap. You've taken numbers that relate to one fact and assumed they must also relate to another with nothing actual to connect them.

[–] Kbobabob 3 points 1 day ago

Boy, I just love the games politics plays on people for political gain.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] LifeInMultipleChoice 5 points 2 days ago

I mean Obama removed some of the embargo restrictions and Trump put them back. I'm not certain putting much effort into that is worth it with dwindling time