this post was submitted on 14 Jan 2025
193 points (99.0% liked)

politics

19339 readers
2231 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

The Washington Post editorial board announced support for nearly all of Donald Trump’s Cabinet nominees, except four: Pete Hegseth, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Tulsi Gabbard, and Russell Vought.

The board justified its decisions by prioritizing minimal disqualifying factors over strong qualifications.

Some nominees, including Pam Bondi and Chris Wright, were approved despite controversies, such as ties to Trump’s 2020 election denial and climate change skepticism.

Critics argue the endorsements reflect loyalty over merit, raising concerns about the nominees’ qualifications and the paper’s objectivity under Jeff Bezos's ownership.

top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 hours ago

Bezos, a rich white billionaire who owns WP, donated money to Trump, also a rich white billionaire.

Now WP supports Trump. What a coincidence.

[–] SulaymanF 2 points 3 hours ago

So happy I cancelled my subscription last year. The once venerable paper we loved is gone.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Linda McMahon in charge of education is fine with them?

There's not even any darkness left for democracy to die in anymore.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Wrestling is still real to them

[–] Boiglenoight 2 points 9 hours ago

I love this.

[–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie 4 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Is it insane to protect yourself from potentially the most powerful dictator to exist? The fact I'm saying this about trump makes me so mad.

Edit:

To all you that made this possible and reside here in the states. I never understood you. I never liked you. I never wanted to be around you. I hope you're miserable.

[–] Maggoty 6 points 11 hours ago

I'll admit they suckered me with a really good deal when Ann Telnaes left. But this is showing that she was 100% right. It's time to cancel WaPo folks. It's no better than the US Chamber of Commerce's* press releases.

Note - Not actually a government agency, they're a business lobby that cosplays a government agency.

[–] CharlesDarwin 37 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

This is our "liberal media", correct?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

Yes, but you gotta remember that liberalism is a capitalist ideology based on racism, colonialism, etc.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 hours ago

If the liberals of ~~Reddit~~ Lemmy could understand that, they'd be very upset.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 17 hours ago

The WaPo is dead to me.

[–] snekerpimp 94 points 22 hours ago

Propaganda machine owned by a billionaire supports an incoming fascist regime? Aw man, too bad this has never happened before and we have no history to learn from about this.

[–] idiomaddict 11 points 15 hours ago

I thought they weren’t making political endorsements anymore…

[–] Fandangalo 32 points 20 hours ago

Really cool they…

prioritized minimal disqualifying factors over strong qualifications.

So, there’s nothing great about them, and they are just above the bar on “disqualifying” as they see it.

[–] uberdroog 32 points 22 hours ago

Propaganda machine...feels like the author doesn't know this isn't a news organization anymore.

[–] teamevil 19 points 20 hours ago

Not disappointed I cancelled my subscription

[–] [email protected] 4 points 16 hours ago

It's completely sane if you consider the shared class interests of Trump and Bezos.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 20 hours ago

Who cares? Not sure they have an audience anymore... alienated both sides and their own staff, tons of major departures. These opinions are embarrassing, desperate attempts to sound relevant again.

[–] xc2215x 3 points 20 hours ago

Wow. That is a crazy change.

[–] Bonesince1997 1 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I guess it's what those braindead readers want.

Someone who agrees with Trump's election interference, of which a news story breaks that said he would have been convicted for his meddling, is seen as someone with strong qualifications for Attorney General?! Yeah fuck you.

[–] Maggoty 3 points 11 hours ago

Not really they keep taking huge hits on their subscriber numbers. 10% dropped after the non-endorsement crap. I'm interested in finding numbers for Ann Telnaes' departure and the bleeding of the newsroom. But there's a reason they show ads on their page now.