this post was submitted on 09 Jan 2025
180 points (97.9% liked)

politics

19330 readers
1990 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Donald Trump, previously committed to an "America First" foreign policy, has embraced an imperialist agenda in his second term.

He’s proposed Greenland’s annexation, pressuring Canada to join the U.S. as its 51st state, and threatening Panama Canal control.

Critics, including former allies, warn these actions undermine U.S. alliances, embolden adversaries like Russia and China, and disrupt global norms on sovereignty.

While supporters claim these moves address national security, allies such as Canada and Denmark have condemned the rhetoric, with experts warning of potential NATO conflicts and diplomatic fallout.

all 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 53 points 4 days ago

Magoo: "I like Trump because he's anti-war. Demonrats would start WWIII."

Trump: "GIMME EVERYTHING YOU GOT WORLD! I'M TAKING IT BY FORCE IF I HAVE TO!"

[–] RufusFirefly 44 points 4 days ago (4 children)

His platform was supposed to be grocery prices and immigration. What happened to those?

[–] [email protected] 34 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Crucially, the policies Trump wants are designed to make himself and his cronies richer. But they will not lower consumer prices -- it's quite the opposite in most cases.

Hence the need for the diversion. Shit is about to get a lot worse and he's hoping no one will notice.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago

Yup, get everyone distracted with Greenland and Canada while we fuck them over. And the media eats it up as usual.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

Simple.

He'll raise grocery prices via tariffs, and exacerbate immigration via a refugee crisis caused by wars.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago

Where did you see that? His MO his entire life has been a policy of "do whatever makes me the most money"

That was his policy last term, and that's still his policy this term.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago

Can't have immigrants if all of the world is part of the US.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 5 days ago

How to blame literally the world for your own internal problems like debt healthcare and wage slavery

Just keep breaking shit and pointing fingers instead of sucking it up and dealing with spending issues and printing cash

[–] [email protected] 18 points 4 days ago

with experts warning of potential NATO conflicts and diplomatic fallout.

There's the point. Once again, Trump is charged with weakening NATO and Western alliances.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

America

new preoccupation

Imperialism

doubt

Also, this is very certainly a strategy to distract from internal problems.

[–] TheDemonBuer 10 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I've felt for a while now that there is more than one kind of nationalism. One is supremacist, colonialist, and imperialist. This, I think, is the nationalism people think of when they think of nationalism. This is the nationalism of Nazi Germany, for instance. It's the nationalism of people who believe strongly in hierarchies, especially ones that they believe are "natural." They believe that some individuals are inherently superior to other individuals, and they believe that some groups are inherently superior to other groups. They seek to establish hierarchies of power within their nation, but also between nations.

In the context of today's world, in which the US is the dominant global superpower, American "nationalists" believe that the US is inherently superior to all other nations, and, therefore, that the US global hegemony should not only be maintained, but expanded. They believe it is right and good and natural for the US to rule and dominate the globe, because, in their mind, we are just superior to all other nations.

I think there is another kind of nationalism, though, one of people who seek independence and autonomy for their group or nation, usually from an imperialist power. It's one in which people who value their distinct culture and history want to see to it maintained and preserved. They don't believe their culture is superior to all others, they just believe it should exist without interference from outside groups.

I understand and sympathize with the latter kind of nationalism, but I do not understand, and I in fact hate and despise, the former. I do not believe that any group of people is inherently superior to any other. I reject supremacism in its entirety. I believe that any nation has just as much right to exist peaceably as any other. I wholeheartedly reject colonialism, expansionism, imperialism, and supremacism, but I support the right of any nation to exist, on their piece of the Earth, with their distinct culture, independently and autonomously, so long as they can do so peacefully.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I think it's nationalism (superiority) Vs patriotism (love)

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 days ago

That is very succinctly accurate.

Unfortunately the USA has been fed a steady diet of nationalism branded as Patriot Juice with extra Freedom for a long time and too many people have been drinking at the trough.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago

Is there a general word for people who think that some groups are superior to others?

[–] ATDA 8 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Watching racists bark about h1b's due to racism but somehow ignore annexing Mexico.

Edit derp keyboard and no proofreading.

[–] cowfodder 3 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Don't have to issue visas if Mexico becomes a US state.

Of course, if Mexico becomes a US state then theoretically the Mexicans become US citizens, with all the rights and protections that affords.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

He probably thinks he can just Puerto Rico them and make them a territory without representation

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago

I think he can.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 days ago

He probably thinks he can just Puerto Rico them and deny them full states rights

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago

How is imperialism not "my country first"

I think these go together well.