this post was submitted on 08 Jan 2025
520 points (94.4% liked)

Selfhosted

40964 readers
732 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 3) 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] aluminium 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Odd, I have a Celeron J3455 which according to Intel only supports 8GB, yet I run it with 16 GB

[–] kalleboo 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Same here in a Synology DS918+. It seems like the official Intel support numbers can be a bit pessimistic (maybe the higher density sticks/chips just didn't exist back when the chip was certified?)

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yup. Gateway E-475M. It has trouble transcoding some plex streams, but it keeps chugging along. $5 well spent.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

it can do it!

... just not today

got a ripping and converting pc that ain't any better. it's all it does, so speed don't matter any. hb has queue, so nbd. i just let it go... and go... and go...

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

I faced that only with different editions of Windows limiting it by itself.

[–] Presi300 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Aw yep, bought an old HP pro-lient something something with 2 old-ass intel xeons and 64GB ram for practically nothing. Thing's been great. It's a bit loud but runs anything I throw at it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] popekingjoe 2 points 1 day ago

The oldest hardware I'm still using is an Intel Core i5-6500 with 48GB of RAM running our Palworld server. I have an upgrade in the pipeline to help with the lag, because the CPU is constantly stressed, but it still will run game servers.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

Yep, mspencer dot net (what little of it is currently up, I suck at ops stuff) is 2012-vintage hardware, four boxes totaling 704 GB RAM, 8x10TB SAS disks, and a still-unused LTO-3 tape drive. I’ll upgrade further when I finally figure out how to make proper use of what I already have. Until then it’s all a fancy heated cat tree, more or less.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

Me on a RPi4.

[–] robalees 4 points 1 day ago (5 children)

2012 Mac Mini with a fucked NIC because I man handled it putting in a SSD. Those things are tight inside!

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] passiveaggressivesonar 3 points 1 day ago

Why didn't you post this before I bought the RAM?!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

My home Kubernetes cluster started out on a Core i7-920 with 8 GB of memory.

Upgraded to 16 GB memory

Upgraded to a Core i5-2400S

Upgraded to a Core i7-3770

Upgraded to 32 GB memory

Recently Upgraded to a Core i5-7600K

I think I'll stay with that for rather long...

I did however add 2 Intel NUCs (gen 6 and gen 8) to the cluster to have a distributed control plane and some distributed storage.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

I met someone that was throwing out old memory modules. Literally boxes full of DDR, DDR2 modules. I got quite excited, hoping to upgrade my server’s memory. Yeah, DDR2 only goes up to 2GiB. So I am stuck with 2×2GiB. But I am only using 85% of that anyways, so it’s fine.

[–] bigb 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

My i5 6600k will turn 10 years old this year. I'm fortunate because upgrading to 32 GB should keep it running for a while still.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Oldest I got is limited to 16GB (excluding rPis). My main desktop is limited to 32GB which is annoying, because I sometimes need more. But, I have a home server with 128GB of RAM that I can use when it's not doing other stuff. I once needed more than 128GB of RAM (to run optimizations on a large ONNX model, iirc), so had to spin up an EC2 instance with 512GB of RAM.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Wow, it's been a long time since I had hardware that awful.

My old NAS was a Phenom II x4 from 2009, and I only retired it a year and a half ago when I upgraded my PC. But I put 8GB RAM into that since it was a 64-bit processor (could've put up to 32GB I think, since it had 4 DDR3 slots). My NAS currently runs a Ryzen 1700, but I still have that old Phenom in the closet in case that Ryzen dies, but I prefer the newer HW because it's lower power.

That said, I once built a web server on an Arduino which also supported websockets (max 4 connections). That was more of a POC than anything though.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

I used to self host some stuff on an old 2011 iMac. Worked fine, actually

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

I'm hosting a minio cluster on my brother-in-law's old gaming computer he spent $5k on in 2012 and 3 five year old mini-pcs with 1tb external drives plugged into them. Works fine.

[–] Blue_Morpho 0 points 1 day ago (5 children)

What hardware are you using where the cpu says you are limited to 4gb?

Even a 25 year old Pentium 4 supports 8GB.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Might be using a laptop where the RAM is soldered to the board. I've got a Thinkpad X280 that's like that: no slots, just surface-mounted RAM.

[–] Blue_Morpho 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's Lenovo's fault, not Intel.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Intel atom D525

Oh wow, I just saw the comment about it being an ancient Atom. Yeah, fair enough!

[–] AbidanYre 4 points 1 day ago (3 children)
[–] Blue_Morpho 1 points 1 day ago

Maybe. But it would need to be an Atom from 15 years ago. Anything newer does 32 GB.

Of course motherboards don't support it but that's not the cpu's fault.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

8GB can be stuffy on certain programs

[–] theunknownmuncher 1 points 1 day ago

My guess is an x86 32bit machine

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Negative, Pentium 4 was x86 and thus could only address 32 bits.

64bit CPUs started hitting the mainstream in 2003, but 64bit Windows didn't take off until Win7 in 2009. (XP had it, but no one bothered switching from 32b XP to 64b XP just to use more memory and have early adoption issues. Vista had it, but no one had Vista).

[–] Blue_Morpho 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

The Pentium 4 supported PAE and 36 bit PSE

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Physical_Address_Extension

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Physical_Address_Extension#:~:text=This%20article%20needs%20additional%20citations,may%20be%20challenged%20and%20removed.&text=In%20computing%2C%20Physical%20Address%20Extension,the%20operating%20system%20enables%20PAE.

It's kind of like how the 8086 was a 16 bit processor but could access 1 megabyte of ram (640k ram 384 k reserved for rom) . -Or the 286 which was 16 bit but could access 24 MB.

But even without that the Prescott P4's supported 64 bits.

[–] 486 1 points 1 day ago (3 children)

While technically true, the P4 did support PAE, in reality you couldn't really make use of it on consumer hardware for most of its lifetime. No ordinary socket 478 mainboard with DDR1 memory supported more than 4 GB of RAM. With socket 775 more RAM was possible, but that socket is "only" ~20 years old.

Besides that, there were other even newer systems that supported only 4 GB of RAM, like some Intel Atom mainboards with a single DDR2 socket. Same with Via C3 mainboards.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›