this post was submitted on 03 Jan 2025
205 points (99.5% liked)

News

23747 readers
3729 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Ohio Governor Mike DeWine signed a bill allowing law enforcement agencies to charge up to $750 per video for public records requests involving police body cams, dash cams, or jail surveillance.

Critics, including the NAACP and ACLU, argued the fees could discourage public access to critical footage, such as videos of police encounters.

The fee is optional and capped to reflect production costs, but must be paid upfront.

DeWine defended the bill but expressed openness to revising the law if unintended consequences arise. Previously, public record fees were limited to nominal copying costs.

top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 77 points 2 days ago (3 children)

But don't public tax dollars pay for the police force??

[–] [email protected] 39 points 2 days ago

Our tax dollars pay for tons of things we are supposed to benefit from, but it seems like a lot of the time, we don't see those benefits we're supposed to be getting.

This sure seems like another way of making it easier to cover that bullshit up, especially when poor people are affected.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If you consider funds derived from fines, fees, and civil asset forfeiture taxes, then yeah.

[–] Lemminary 2 points 2 days ago

I thought that was on top of the public funding. Greedy pigs.

[–] ChlkDstTtr 6 points 2 days ago

With that point I could possibly see the justification for charging non-Ohioans (I think that’s what they’re called) but not residents. Just because I can see the justification in that doesn’t mean I agree with it though.

[–] [email protected] 50 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Does that mean that police will pay up to $750 for CCTV video footage requested for evidence now? Yeah I didn't think so.

[–] kn33 20 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Actually, I wonder if this could be used as a precedent for getting compensation when you have to comply with a subpoena.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

Government: Rules for thee, not for me

[–] Lemminary 3 points 2 days ago

I'd charge double and give at least half to the victims. I'll keep some for the cleaning costs of dealing with swine.

[–] Scolding7300 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Suggest a law to help make it harder to reveal unintended consequences, but revise if unintended consequences happen. Got it

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

The unintended consequence would not shielding the police from accountability as much as they intended to.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 2 days ago

Seems that charging fees like that will make it profitable to hire video editors to provide a "top notch highlighted edits reel" for every FOI reasons, what could possibly go wrong?