this post was submitted on 03 Jan 2025
261 points (99.6% liked)

News

23757 readers
3077 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

A US appeals court ruled that the FCC lacks authority to reinstate federal net neutrality rules, blocking Biden administration efforts to restore open internet protections.

The 2015 rules, repealed in 2017, mandated ISPs treat internet traffic equally and barred content blocking or prioritization.

The court cited a recent Supreme Court decision Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, limiting federal agency powers.

FCC Chair Jessica Rosenworcel urged Congress to pass federal net neutrality laws, while industry groups praised the decision, claiming it will boost innovation.

The ruling leaves state net neutrality laws, like California's, intact.

top 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] danekrae 142 points 3 days ago (2 children)

industry groups praised the decision, claiming it will boost innovation.

It's funny how they spell the word profits in a new trendy way.

[–] TheTechnician27 51 points 3 days ago

The innovation is in new ways to screw over the consumer.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Perhaps they meant to say limitation. It's weird how in my entire life, corpo always uses the same phrases, and learning from history, they have used them for so long. Even back during the AT&T antitrust in the 80s, they were bemoaning how innovation would be stifled if AT&T was broken up.

I can't wait to see innovations return like, listening to streaming music on your favorite app at work on Verizon, 5pm comes around. For some mysterious reason, your app stops streaming music. Launch Verizon's preferred streaming app. It works just fine! (Actual thing I experienced with daily frequency before net neutrality suddenly made their network perform like expected.)

[–] captainlezbian 6 points 2 days ago

But they also insist that competition breeds innovations when you propose the state just seize their unregulated utility

[–] [email protected] 40 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

If they lack authority to reinstate... Then didn't they also lack the authority to remove the Obama era net neutrality protections in the first place?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago

Several things have changed recently, Chevron being the big one that comes to mind. Federal judges are basically gonna end up making a lot of decisions when these cases end up being pushed. The agencies have been defanged completely.

[–] HexadecimalSky 81 points 3 days ago (2 children)

The Federal Communications Commission, lacks the authority? Then who has the authority. This is the same and sets a precedent for, say, cellular companies. Oh, your a Verizon customer, sorry you can't call this company.

[–] [email protected] 77 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

You can thank the Supreme Court's 'Loper Bright' decision in June https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loper_Bright_Enterprises_v._Raimondo

Edit: Actually, you can thank Republicans. The agenda to privatize everything (for the benefit of Wall Street investors) has been in place for over 50 years. Essentially, the constitution says nothing about providing people internet access so that means either the states can do it themselves or it can go to a private corporation. I'm telling you, the next four years are going to be apocalyptic.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 3 days ago

The problem is that there is no ambiguity in this case. It's 100% clear that Congress DID give this specific regulatory authority to the FCC and it takes an incredibly tortured legal argument to say otherwise. You can thank Loper Bright only for giving slight cover to these blatantly unlawful rulings.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 days ago

Translation: court over steps boundaries, Trump's supreme court will uphold it on appeal, rich bastards get richer.

So it's yet another day ending with the letter Y.

[–] FuglyDuck 68 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I vote somebody set ups a DDOS attack on this judge's ISP and see how he feels about it after he can't get his Step-bro porn.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 3 days ago

The oligarchs got your interwebs

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 days ago

Ok. So this is definately a seconded of that horrible ruling. ugh.