They've been acting like that from the start π€·π»ββοΈ
this post was submitted on 27 Dec 2024
390 points (97.3% liked)
Technology
60251 readers
5647 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Oh boy, how surprising.
The bait and switch classic.
I'm clutching my pearls as I type this.
So the development of inorganic intelligence, considered by many as an inflection point in human civilisation is to be handed to business graduates who are historically proven to be capable of any level of atrocity in the name of corporate greed. America, fuck yeah.
~~America~~ Greed, fuck yeah.
Don't fool yourself. The USA lost the exclusivity deal on unchecked corpo greed a long time ago. This is a global issue now.
Always has been.
Yeah, the American tag was just a throwaway line, greed unchecked, insane and self-harming has always been with us. We let it sit with us around our camp fires like wolves but unlike wolves we never tamed it.
load more comments
(2 replies)
Actually corporations themselves are 99% of what people fear about AGI already in their inhuman decisionmaking to the detriment of humanity.
load more comments
(3 replies)
Stop depending on these proprietary LLMs. Go to [email protected].
There are open-source LLMs you can run on your own computer if you have a powerful GPU. Models like OLMo and Falcon are made by true non-profits and universities, and they reach GPT-3.5 level of capability.
There are also open-weight models that you can run locally and fine-tune to your liking (although these donβt have open-source training data or code). The best of these (Alibabaβs Qwen, Metaβs llama, Mistral, Deepseek, etc.) match and sometimes exceed GPT 4o capabilities.
And there are also free, online hosted instances of those same LLMs in a (relatively speaking) privacy-protecting format from DuckDuckGo, for anyone who doesn't have a powerful GPU :)
i'm not so sure on the privacy of any of this.
Interesting. So they mix the requests between all DDG users before sending them to βunderlying model providersβ. The providers like OAI and Anthropic will likely log the requests, but mixing is still a big step forward. My question is what do they do with the open-weight models? Do they also use some external inference provider that may log the requests? Or does DDG control the inference process?
load more comments
(2 replies)
load more comments
(4 replies)
I thought they were a for-profit company all this time.
Pretty much non-profit in name only. Some shady hybrid model.
OpenAI sure seems like a case study in how to grift everyone by masquerading as a non profit whilst actually enriching yourself and your shareholders, causing a whole new class of societal problems in the process.
load more comments
(1 replies)
No problem, after they release all the data collected under the excuse of public good and progress.
Sam:
That's very open of them
Open to All Income.
Shocking nobody
Well, apart from the people like me who thought they had always been one because they acted exactly like one.
load more comments
(1 replies)
So, ads in chat now?
'subtle' product recommendations
I'm Open AI and this is my favorite shop in the Citadel.
Yup, conversational product plugs
load more comments
(1 replies)
They should also change their name to ClosedAI while they're at it.
There was never another outcome.
Capitalism breeds one thing, and it certainly isn't innovation, and it most definitely isnt not-for-profit innovation.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Hahaha. April 1st is early this year.
They are never going to make enough money by selling licenses and subscriptions for the cost of their current models (smarter people than me have made good estimates), let alone the future ones. Those future models are at a much worse performance-cost ratio. Ads will at best bring in about 1 usd per user per month (estimated by Facebook revenue and number of users) - double or triple it just for lolz, and they would still be losing money.
So⦠how will this be pulled off? Only wrong answers!
Have a partnership with Microsoft and ship Windows 12 as the new "AI only" OS. Every command must go through ChatGPT to work. Then push updates to older Win11 OS to make them unusable.
load more comments
(1 replies)
How fast are they burning money right now?
Based on their funding rounds, $10 billion lasts about 18 months.
So about $555 million per month.
load more comments
(10 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
No kidding. π
Lol like it wasn't always.
Didnt they do this like a year ago
Yes, but I don't think they made a profit so giving it another go
This is going to sound weird but so is the internet their icon suggests a chain of bodies eating out the ass of the one in front of them which to me seems apt for the product
load more comments
(3 replies)
view more: next βΊ