this post was submitted on 21 Dec 2024
103 points (96.4% liked)

Games

33397 readers
935 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 98 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What deadlines? Squadron 42 was supposed to release in 2016...

That ship has sailed.

[–] psmgx 28 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yeah was about to say something similar.

What's some special about this deadline?

[–] ampersandrew 37 points 1 month ago

This deadline was set once the money was coming in more slowly than it was going out.

[–] [email protected] 57 points 1 month ago (1 children)

There was a deadline? What did they set, a 20 year development cycle???

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 month ago

Must ship by: ~~2017~~ ~~2020~~ ~~2025~~ The heat death of the universe

[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

As of now, Star Citizen has raised $769,261,551. Three quarters of a billion dollars.

And now they say they need to fire the QA department to "laser focus" to meet the deadlines of the release. That's when you need QA the most. Otherwise that release is going to be a fucking mess.

I call bullshit. This is a money saving decision, which means they've blown through their $760 million dollar bank account. Insane.

[–] orrk 1 points 1 month ago

the source is anonymous, I'd take this info with a heaping serving of NaCl

[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 month ago (1 children)

prominently those in the QA department, as a part of its restructuring efforts.

That's certainly one way to make sure you hit a deadline.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 month ago

They just find pesky bugs, that need to be fixed. No bugs, no need to fix stuff.

[–] Agent_Karyo 32 points 1 month ago

... with head honcho Christ Roberts ...

Interesting typo.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm surprised they set a deadline at all, considering how the game itself will never release

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago

Oh it'll release, just not by Chris Roberts.

The last game he was in charge of was Freelancer, a highly ambitious game for the time and he never finished it. His company, Digital Anvil, started to have financial woes due to the long development of Freelancer and was acquired by Microsoft. He left the company and then a couple years later Freelancer was released!

It was very different from what it was supposed to be, but it was still an awesome game, imo.

I think the same thing will happen to Star Citizen. The money will dry up and they'll be forced to sell. The buyer will kick Chris out and then have the team make a finished product.

[–] squirrelwithnut 20 points 1 month ago

They have deadlines?

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 month ago

What deadline? Of their life? Cause deadlines are gone since it was supposed to release 10 Yeats ago

[–] warmaster 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What are the chances they never deliver what they promised?

[–] JiveTurkey 22 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] CitizenKong 6 points 1 month ago

Yep, at this point, never actually releasing the game is part of the business model.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 month ago (2 children)

How is this still a thing lol

Is it playable yet?

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 month ago

Yes.

Buggy, incomplete, kind of a mess, but absolutely playable if you have a sufficient tolerance for jank.

While it's for sure a ways away from being the game that was promised, what's there is still one of the most unique and ambitious gaming experiences you can ever have.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

For all intent and purposes. 4.0 has been by far the most stable release yet. And that is saying something since the player cap is 500 and now has a new star system.

The new Pyro soundtrack is amazing and if you haven't listen to Pedro's work I would recommend to do so.

There are some dumb bugs that qa and the ptu should have found and smashed but they (cig) dragged their feet with 3.24 and server meshing this year IMO.

[–] Agent_Karyo 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

To be fair the "most stable release yet" label is applied to almost every patch by star citizen fans.

Just take a look at any reddit thread (let alone the fan forum) and for every patch you having something along the lines of "perfectly stable" or "best AI I've ever encountered" or "a monumental achievement".

And yet you have threads like this one:

https://robertsspaceindustries.com/spectrum/community/SC/forum/3/thread/4-0-preview-unplayable

There is a reason to be skeptical of "most stable release yet" style proclamations.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago

Its a buggy mess and they axe qa?
I guess when you have so many pay piggies you dont need to pay anypne

[–] MehBlah 8 points 1 month ago

Since when does anything to do with star citizen involve a hard deadline. Roberts will never get finished. He lacks that basic ability.

[–] Harvey656 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm pretty happy with 4.0. They sucked all the features from it, and the missions are having problems. But the game fucking works, finally. Or at least it did during the first 24 hours of the patch. About fucking time.

That being said this whole shake up was clearly a cost saving strategy, since most of 2024 was not the best in term of making money, a LOT of people jumped shit this year, and I don't blame them. CIG messed up so much this year. They have alot of goodwill to re-earn from the community and 4.0 is a start but only that.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

They're 3rd highest. Possibly could break to be 2nd highest year of funding. Wanted that the be clarified.

But I bet acquiring turbulent has put a slight bump in their expenses.

[–] aciDC14 1 points 4 weeks ago

There’s a deadline?