this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2024
303 points (99.7% liked)

politics

19222 readers
2745 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CharlesDarwin 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

What I'd like to know is was Andreesen always this much of an asshole?

I knew he went VC and figured he was at least kinda douchey, but I didn't follow his arc since the 90s where most of us just knew him as the guy that worked on Mosaic and founded Netscape...

[–] [email protected] 62 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Mamma Mia! I wonder if the Mario Brothers know how to solve this issue

[–] Dkarma 21 points 1 week ago

Give that man in green a mushroom

[–] [email protected] 54 points 1 week ago

I mean the Koch brothers walked so these goons could run. They literally started the trend of using dark money in politics. The book Dark Money is about THEM.

I don't see a reason to place oligarchs in a hierarchy, they're all trash.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 week ago

Why bother? No one gets to that position by caring about others.

[–] CharlesDarwin 27 points 1 week ago (2 children)

When will these people ever have enough? It's a sickness. I mean, seriously.

[–] kautau 5 points 1 week ago

Many humans are fucking hot garbage (I mean that in the double entendre) and are basically so focused on their competition and their legacy that wealth doesn’t mean anything for them. And so many other shitty humans want nothing more than to be in that position because there’s some genetic wiring for some people that their best feeling is being better than someone else, and now that’s taken to the extremes we see today.

[–] fluxion 3 points 1 week ago

Bunch if billionaires scheming on how to make money through high crimes against America. Like...go sail in your fucking yachts and get the fuck out of our White House you insanely greedy fucks.

[–] uberdroog 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Depending on what timeline we are on, it might not work out so well for them in the long run. Fingers crossed.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago

Sounds like a job for The Adjuster

[–] rayyy 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

United Health Care CEO Brian Thompson was pretty brazen - just saying.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Maybe Musk can be as brazen as United Health Care CEO Brian Thompson.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

I don't think Musk is capable enough. In fact I would challenge or even triple dog dare Musk to not use any security from here on out. I know he won't because he's not man enough.

[–] Hobbes_Dent 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Because they don’t have to.

People don’t care enough to stop them.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I don't think it'll be much longer before they have no choice but to care.