this post was submitted on 02 Dec 2024
397 points (98.8% liked)

World News

39212 readers
3519 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 5 points 18 hours ago

Big round of golf claps for the "bleed Russia out slowly " strategy.

Top men.... top men.

[–] gsfraley 27 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Give them a nuke back. Them relinquishing theirs assuming good faith by the Russians is half the reason this mess started. If they get one back it makes a push for total control of Ukraine an existential risk for Russia.

Edit: Before someone points it out, yes I'm being wildly naive, let me dream about a good outcome a little.

[–] FordBeeblebrox 6 points 21 hours ago

I was a grunt not a rocket scientist so serious question: do we have missiles they can load in the old Soviet silos or would it have to be a SCUD situation?

Either way, giving Kyiv a giant middle finger to wave at Moscow on the way out would be an epic mic drop moment for Biden.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Granted.

They don't have to actually get the nuke back.

Everyone just has to think they did. The idea is just as much a weapon as the bomb itself.

The old squirt-gun pistol routine, lol.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 day ago

Tbh, from what I’ve read, it sounds a lot like Sullivan is the primary character behind all the hesitancy and pussy-footing and restrictions around the military aid coming from the US. As far as I understand it, Sullivan still seems deathly afraid that Russia is some big military bogeyman, when the outcome of the last two years has revealed them to be anything but, and whose only real “virtue” is a willingness to enthusiastically use meat waves at a strategic level. I’m concerned that Sullivan will continue to slow-walk everything, despite the circumstances.

[–] givesomefucks 65 points 2 days ago

Trump has expressed skepticism regarding the level of aid sent to Ukraine, which puts him at odds with Biden, who has been a staunch ally of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy as the country continues its fight against Russia.

Which is why it's so fucked up Biden's first priority was Israel.

I'll give credit to Biden for the arms to Ukraine when Ukraine receives them. I don't know why people on either side keep giving credit any earlier.

[–] peopleproblems 31 points 2 days ago (8 children)

Now 'ere's what crazy-ol' u/peopleproblems would do. Crazy ol' u/peopleroblems would come to the sum of bitches we have in Acquisitions, and say 'how many weeks could a force of exactly Ukraine's force hold a position with everything we have currently sitting in storage deployment ready, but not otherwise deployed? Ok, and how about all the equipment we have being delivered under contract for that many weeks? Ok, now, get me a number to replace all that equipment with the newest contracts set to immediately fill everything we send for that first chunk. Ok, now double it, and phone the pencil pushers to get procurement offers for this shit from the defense manufacturers. Yes, definitely let their boards know too. Oh, don't mention where the already purchased equipment is going, that's national security interest. Just mention the US is interested in making them rich in turn for securing our country for a long time."

"And give that number to Congress?"

"Once the various board members hear first. We gotta feed the handlers before we treat the pawns in Congress."

"Sir is that, legal?"

"It's an official act. I just made it legal."

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] homesweethomeMrL 45 points 2 days ago
load more comments
view more: next ›