this post was submitted on 02 Dec 2024
179 points (99.4% liked)

PC Gaming

8854 readers
168 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Fuck blizzard. They can't even respect their own legacy.

[–] CaptPretentious 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Honestly, Blizzard died off a long time ago. That's not even a joke. Activision Blizzard is shown as being founded in 2008. The company name and its IP is basically just got sold off in used.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

Just call them Microsoft

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago

Legacy is for individuals. When a company changes ownership and staff so many times, its basically a ship of Theseus. The only priority is whether this product is generating income.

This is why it is so laughable for customers to be loyal to a company.

[–] DarkCloud 16 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Blizzard wants to hide the fact that Warcraft and Warcraft II were fun, and in a completely different genre than WoW....

...and they weren't subscription model games. I liked those games. Good Solo games, very replayable with various AI skirmish modes, and you could even get a map editor.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 month ago

It's much more likely they want to boost the sales of their recently launched Remaster.

Still shitty, of course.

[–] TrousersMcPants 2 points 1 month ago

This is such a weird take

[–] AMillionMonkeys 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This version of Warcraft II has the map editor, right? I really enjoyed building my own tower defense scenarios.
I'll pass otherwise.

[–] SkyezOpen 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The original did. I assume this would as well.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

It does. It launches into either an enhanced remaster with LAN-only support or the original Battle.Net enabled version, although I wonder if that one will survive the delisting, even with GOG support.

This thread suggests you guys haven't bought them, which you may want to correct. They're good versions and GOG is one bad Witcher sequel from not being viable, so it needs as much support as it can get for these situations.

[–] BoiLudens 7 points 1 month ago

Well I just grabbed em, just like when sega was delisting their Dreamcast lineup, figure it’s a better time than never

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Anyone finding out too late Exodos!.. wheew scuse me must be a cold going about

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Why is Warcraft specifically Blizzard's fucking kryptonite? Starcraft Remastered is great and has the super cute Carbot reskin. D2 Resurrected is an awesome recreation of Diablo 2. Warcraft 3 Resurrected is still a shitshow even after the 2.0 patch, and 1+2 have the quality of an old mobile game.