this post was submitted on 26 Nov 2024
184 points (98.9% liked)

politics

19232 readers
3777 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

LMAOOO MUSKY IS SO MAD ABOUT IT NOW

all 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 79 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Musk has said he supports ending subsidies for EVs, oil and gas.

"Yeah, but not my subsidies!"

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago

Well it's funnier when other evs get it and teslas don't.

[–] [email protected] 55 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Republicans hate it when Democrats use the same tactics they do.

But this is what they wanted. They wanted to fight dirty, well, they've got it. They wanted a government that played favorites and picked winners and losers.

Kiss reasonable democracy that doesn't play favorites goodbye, this is what you asked for, Republicans.

It always boils down to "rules for thee, not for me."

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago

You act like the left has the upper hand or something. We'll get a few blips in, but overall we're gonna be fucked. The right owns all branches of government and the courts.

[–] [email protected] 39 points 3 weeks ago

Good. Musk's companies sure do rely on a lot of corporate socialism.

[–] just_another_person 23 points 3 weeks ago

Good. Kia, Hyundai, Toyota, and others have been as well when their efficiency ratios aren't great.

[–] taiyang 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Tesla was one of the very few federal options, too. I still want an EV and Cali might be my only shot at affording one (but honestly I'd prefer seeing renters assistance as a higher priority to fight homelessness first, though. Too bad that's not popular with neolibs)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

It'd be coming from the cap and trade sustainability fund, so it couldn't be used for housing, unless you could show that housing would reduce emissions. Still a lot better ways to spend the money, solar and wind, grid scale battery capacity, mass transit and high speed rail investment etc.

[–] Takumidesh 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Why? I read the article and I'm not exactly sure what these proposed rebates are for or what qualifies a car or person to be eligible for them.

I didn't even see in the article anything that said Tesla would be excluded, other than a non-quote of maybe. Maybe I'm just missing something obvious.