this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2024
304 points (99.7% liked)

Political Memes

5510 readers
2918 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I think this timeline is designed to be my villain origin story

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 days ago

Science man - kills popular people with well researched traps

[–] dual_sport_dork 7 points 5 days ago

"My ignorance is just as good as your facts."

[–] lennybird 5 points 4 days ago

When the wise man points to the rising trend, the fool looks at the local minimum.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago

I think it's more about specialization. An actual expert is specialized in a very small area. This is not as interesting as someone who claims to have unlocked the mysteries of the universe.

I think Jordan Peterson is a great example. He's an expert in a tiny research area related to alcoholism. But he lectures about chaos dragons, cleaning your room, etc. Which is going to make more fame/money for him?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

Perhaps it's a difference in communication experience, and effectiveness? Maybe the person who is already famous has lots of experience with talking to people and conveying information — perhaps they make more efficient use of a small amount of information — whereas the person with a lot of experience on the subject matter, but is poor at communication, is unable to effectively communicate the subject matter. One must be able to retain people's attention to effectively communicate; this takes skill.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago

It definitely is imo.

The fields jargon is necessary for the experts to talk effeciently to each other, then it becomes second nature for them.

Then, when they have to talk about their expertise to the public, nothing is retained, actionable or even understood, because there is simply not a common vocabulary backed by the same experiences.

At best you get a confused public, at worst they react with apprehension.

Youd need seasoned science communicators, capable to bridge the "culture" of the public and the one of the experts, which is hard.

Plus, the skills to become an expert are often very different to the ones that a science communicator needs, like summarising in an engrossing way, glossing over the right amount of boring details, empathy and patience for an unresponsive audience...

[–] GladiusB 1 points 4 days ago

I also think the audience plays a roll. If they are eating it up, they will keep spewing it.

[–] homesweethomeMrL 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I find it interesting that within the context of the comic, neither character is using media of any sort.

[–] FenrirIII 10 points 4 days ago (2 children)

The soapbox/pedestal is the metaphor for media

[–] GladiusB 1 points 4 days ago

It was the media up until 150 years ago

[–] [email protected] -2 points 4 days ago

I find it interesting that within the context of the comic, neither character is using metaphor of any sort.